· Public charity
Maryland Legal Services Corporation
To ensure low-income marylanders have access to stable, efficient and effective civil legal assistance through the distribution of funds to nonprofit legal services organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $120k
- $50k–250k25 grants · $2.7M
- $250k+21 grants · $55M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARYLAND LEGAL AID | $29,372,141 |
| COMMUNITY LEGAL SERV OF PG | $4,158,998 |
| PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER | $3,899,690 |
| CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS COALITION | $3,300,000 |
| MARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE | $1,964,415 |
| DISABILITY RIGHTS MD | $1,712,263 |
| SHORE LEGAL ACCESS | $1,356,825 |
| CASA DE MARYLAND | $1,274,850 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MD | $1,216,176 |
| PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER | $1,040,230 |
| EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS | $909,790 |
| WOMEN'S LAW CENTER OF MD | $884,543 |
| HOMELESS PERSONS REPRES PROJ | $761,624 |
| HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND | $666,484 |
| HARFORD COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION | $657,833 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $9.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $507k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CLCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +259% · 77% of their budget
- CACAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION3× · 2023–2025 · $9.9M · revenue +18% · 29% of their budget
- PBPRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC9× · 2017–2025 · $8.6M · revenue +498% · 58% of their budget
Funded once
- AIAnnapolis Immigration Justice Network Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $48k · revenue +47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.
Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.
The D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center provides free legal services through pro bono lawyers to low-income individuals, nonprofit organizations and small businesses primarily in the District of Columbia. The Pro Bono Center also recruits and trains…
Legal aid's mission is to 'make justice real' - in individual and systemic ways - for persons living in poverty in the district of columbia. in particular, legal aid provides civil legal assistance to individuals, families, and communities…
To ensure low-income marylanders have access to stable, efficient and effective civil legal assistance through the distribution of funds to nonprofit legal services organizations.
Sexual Violence Law Center (SVLC) is a nonprofit law firm that protects the safety, privacy, and civil rights of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in Washington through holistic and trauma-informed practices rooted in race and…
Clasi provides free civil legal services to people with disabilities; people with low incomes; victims of housing discrimination; older citizens (60 and over); victims of domestic violence; and immigrant victims of crime, abuse and neglect.
The mission of Virginia Legal Aid Society is to resolve serious legal problems of low-income people, promote economic and family stability, reduce poverty through effective legal assistance, and to champion equal justice.
Virginia poverty law center uses advocacy, education, and litigation to break down systemic barriers that keep low-income virginians in the cycle of poverty.
Baltimore Action Legal Team is dedicated to pursuing creative, community-driven solutions and movement-oriented lawyering to support the Baltimore community.
Our mission is to provide quality representation and zealous advocacy to each client, to conduct our work with professionalism and dignity, and to promote improvement in the administration of justice.
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Law Center of Md Inc and the most unlike its peers is World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEGAL AID BUREAU INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Disability Rights Maryland Inc dba Maryland Disability Law Center Inc ↗
- Who funds SHORE LEGAL ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS PERSONS REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S LAW CENTER OF MD INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BAR FOUNDATION OF HARFORD CO MD INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND BAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Maryland Crime Victims' Resource Center ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLEGANY LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE BAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREESTATE JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds MID-SHORE COUNCIL ON FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds HEARTLY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ST AMBROSE HOUSING AID CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AYUDA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific American Legal ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS OF HOWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN MARYLAND CENTER FOR FAMILY ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds CIVIL JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds WHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CASA - CITIZENS ASSISTING AND SHELTERING THE ABUSED INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEXUAL ASSAULTSPOUSE ABUSE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Venable Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Zanvyl and Isabelle Krieger Fund Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc · Equal Justice Works · The Sidley Austin Foundation · Open Society Institute
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maryland Legal Services Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Maryland Crime Victims' Resource Center — 53% of income from government
- Disability Rights Maryland Inc dba Maryland Disability Law Center Inc — 49% of income from government
- Casa - Citizens Assisting and Sheltering the Abused Inc — 35% of income from government
- Heartly House Inc — 33% of income from government
- Child Justice Inc — 33% of income from government
- Southern Maryland Center for Family Advocacy Inc — 33% of income from government
- Hopeworks of Howard County Inc — 29% of income from government
- Mid-Shore Council On Family Violence — 26% of income from government
- Life Crisis Center Inc — 24% of income from government
- Civil Justice Inc — 23% of income from government
- Baltimore Bar Foundation Inc — 23% of income from government
- Maryland Coalition Against Sexual Assault — 21% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- The Women's Law Center of Md Inc — 18% of income from government
- Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Shore Legal Access Inc — 9% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service Inc — 7% of income from government
- Public Justice Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Community Legal Services of Prince George's County — 4% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Sexual Assaultspouse Abuse Resource Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- Legal Aid Bureau Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maryland Legal Services Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Maryland Legal Services Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.