Skip to content
Mary Galloway Home at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Mary Galloway Home

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$767k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$1.8MHousing & Shelter$265kHealth$195kCrime & Legal$170kArts & Culture$47kCommunity Improvement$25kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $670k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVA MARIA HOME$200,000
MEMPHIS AREA LEGAL SERVICES$150,000
GOLDEN CROSS SENIOR MINISTRIES$60,000
MERGE MEMPHIS$60,000
MERITAN$50,000
BAPTIST MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB$50,000
CREATIVE AGING MEMPHIS$35,000
DESOTO HOPE$25,000
MIFA$25,000
DIXON GALLERY & GARDENS$10,000
MEMORY MAKERS OF THE MIDSOUTH$1,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%MERGE MEMPHIS: $65k → 17%MERGE MEMPHIS: $60k → 17%MERITAN: $50k → 17%MERITAN: $50k → 17%COMMUNITY LEGAL CNETER: $20k → 17%TREZEVANT EPISOPAL HOME: $860k → 17%TREZEVANT EPISCOPAL HOME: $200k → 17%AVA MARIA HOME: $395k → 17%AVA MARIA HOME: $200k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 7 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$2.2M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-20%

Still filing today

86%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $322k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    TREZEVANT EPISCOPAL HOME
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +25%
  • GOLDEN CROSS SENIOR MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $140k · revenue +10%
  • MM
    MERGE MEMPHIS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • BR
    BAPTIST REYNOLDS HOSPICE HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LEGAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Home for the Aging Dba Methodist Homes Corporation

Retirement and nursing home care

Human Services
2
Wesley-Asbury Inc

Provide housing and services as a licensed residential home for the aged.

Housing & Shelter
3
St Mark Manor Inc

None

—
4
Mary Queen of Angels Inc

The organization's mission is to develop, acquire, construct and maintain buildings and property for providing a quality assisted living/alzheimer care facility containing facilities for recreation, instruction, education and administer to…

—
5
Wesley At Graceland Inc D/B/a Wesley Mission Inc

To provide housing and services to low, very low, and extremely low income elderly.

Housing & Shelter
6
United Methodist Memorial Home

Senior communities of care inspiring mind, body, and soul. Our team is united to be premier communities committed to excellence of care through grace, compassion, and respect.

Human Services
7
St Joseph Village Inc

Housing and services for the elderly

—
8
Baptist Homes Society

Building on our over 100 year tradition of excellence, we offer a full continuum of enriched living, compassionate care, and benevolence to a broad spectrum of individuals. we promote a lifestyle of growth, creativity and independence,…

Health
9
The Marian Home

To provide housing, health care, skilled nursing and other related services for aging citizens.

Health
10
Mississippi Methodist Senior Services Inc

Mississippi methodist senior services is dedicated to providing housing and personal care services to the elderly or disabled in the spirit of christian love.

Human Services
11
Catholic Eldercare

Catholic eldercare provides a full continuum of care for seniors. our goal is to support each person throughout the remainder of their lives in a holistic way. we provide care in partnership with family, church and community in as least…

—
12
Presbyterian Home Quitman Retirement Inc

Presbyterian home, quitman, retirement is a christian ministry providing exceptional services to enhance the quality of life for senior adults.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Desoto Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TREZEVANT EPISCOPAL HOME: $1,060,000 · Human ServicesTREZEVANT EPISCOPAL HOMEAVE MARIA HOME INC: $595,220 · Human ServicesAVE MARIA HOME INCMERGE MEMPHIS: $124,500 · Human ServicesMERGE MEMPHISMERITAN INC: $100,000 · Human Services+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividua…Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividua…BAPTIST REYNOLDS HOSPICE HOUSE: $50,000 · OtherBAPTIST R…Individual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherIndividua…TREZEVANT: $7,500 · Other+1 more: $1,700 · OtherMemphis Area Legal Services Inc: $150,000 · Crime & LegalBAPTIST MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $50,000 · HealthB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $50,000 · HealthDESOTO HOPE: $45,000 · HealthGOLDEN CROSS SENIOR MINISTRIES INC: $140,000 · Housing & ShelterCREATIVE AGING MEMPHIS: $35,000 · Arts & CultureDixon Gallery and Gardens: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMIFA CORPORATION: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$1,899,720Other$217,700Crime & Legal$150,000Health$145,000Housing & Shelter$140,000Arts & Culture$45,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTREZEVANT EPISCOPAL HOME: $1,060,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAVE MARIA HOME INC: $595,220 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMemphis Area Legal Services Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGOLDEN CROSS SENIOR MINISTRIES INC: $140,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetMERGE MEMPHIS: $124,500 over 2y, 15% of budgetMERITAN INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBAPTIST MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDESOTO HOPE: $45,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetCREATIVE AGING MEMPHIS: $35,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetMIFA CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDixon Gallery and Gardens: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Christian Community F…Hw Durham Foundation …Thomas W Briggs Found…Plough FoundationThe Assisi Foundation…United Way of the Mid…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Hw Durham Foundation Inc · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · Plough Foundation · The Assisi Foundation of Memphis Inc · United Way of the Mid South · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Galloway Home funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Galloway Home. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Galloway Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home