Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Cannon Morris Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$64kHealth$63kReligion$43kInternational$10kCommunity Improvement$6kHuman Services$6kAnimals$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$796k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - DUKE UNIVERSITY$20,000
RUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
TRINITY AME ZION CHURCH$3,000
EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS$2,000
WTDD 885 NPR RADIO$2,000
WESTOVER CHURCH$2,000
PIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER$2,000
ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS: $2k → 8%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $1k → 14%EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS: $1k → 8%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 11 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$173k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+14%

Still filing today

45%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $54k · revenue +49%
  • ET
    EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • NA
    NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +106%
  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
2
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
3
Wireless Research Center of North Carolina

The Wireless Research Center is an independent, private nonprofit research center dedicated to applied research and engineering. Located in North Carolina's Research Triangle region, the WRC helps clients from around the world develop…

Science & Tech
4
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
5
Lake Norman Humane Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate and rehome homeless pets

Animals
6
Wilkes Medical Center Foundation

To support and carry out the functions and purposes of wrmc hospital operating corporation (dba atrium health wake forest baptist wilkes medical center) to enhance the delivery of quality health care within the organization's region.

Health
7
The Animal Protection Society of Durham

The aps of durham is a leader in building lifelong bonds between people and animals through education, community outreach, and the provision of care for animals in need.

Animals
8
North Carolina Zoological Society Inc

To champion our zoo and its initiatives, wildlife and wild places, with an emphasis on the future.

Animals
9
North Carolina Museum of Life & Science Inc

To create a place of lifelong learning where people, from young child to senior citizen, embrace science as a way of knowing about themselves, their community, and their world.

Arts & Culture
10
North Carolina Council On Economic Education Inc

The nccee provides economic and financial education for educators and students throughout north carolina. this mission is accomplished through standards based workshops and a variety of resources for educators, academic competitions for…

Social Science
11
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

—
12
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unc Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - DUKE UNIVERSITY: $59,000 · OtherTISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - DUKE UNIVERSITYWESTOVER CHURCH: $19,000 · OtherWESTOVER CHURCHTRINITY AME ZION CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherTRINITY AME ZION CHURCHRUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherRUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $4,000 · Other+4 more: $5,750 · Other+4 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $54,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $10,000 · EducationLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INCUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $9,500 · ReligionFCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 · Community ImprovementPIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $4,000 · AnimalsOUR WILD NEIGHBORS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $250 · AnimalsEDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS: $3,000 · Human ServicesNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · International
Other$107,750Education$68,000Religion$9,500Community Improvement$6,000Animals$5,250Human Services$5,000International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS: $3,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOak Ridge Fire and Rescue Company Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR WILD NEIGHBORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds Oak Ridge Fire and Rescue Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR WILD NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Cannon Morris Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Cannon Morris Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Cannon Morris’ filings →

    More from the funding graph