Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mary Cannon Morris Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$64kHealth$63kReligion$43kInternational$10kCommunity Improvement$6kHuman Services$6kAnimals$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$796k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - DUKE UNIVERSITY$20,000
RUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
TRINITY AME ZION CHURCH$3,000
WTDD 885 NPR RADIO$2,000
PIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER$2,000
WESTOVER CHURCH$2,000
EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS$2,000
ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS: $2k → 8%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $1k → 14%EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS: $1k → 8%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$173k · 11 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$173k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+14%

Still filing today

45%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $54k · revenue +49%
  • ET
    EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • NA
    NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +106%
  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
2
Humane Society of Charlotte Inc

Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.

Animals
3
Wireless Research Center of North Carolina

The Wireless Research Center is an independent, private nonprofit research center dedicated to applied research and engineering. Located in North Carolina's Research Triangle region, the WRC helps clients from around the world develop…

Science & Tech
4
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
5
Lake Norman Humane Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate and rehome homeless pets

Animals
6
Wilkes Medical Center Foundation

To support and carry out the functions and purposes of wrmc hospital operating corporation (dba atrium health wake forest baptist wilkes medical center) to enhance the delivery of quality health care within the organization's region.

Health
7
The Animal Protection Society of Durham

The aps of durham is a leader in building lifelong bonds between people and animals through education, community outreach, and the provision of care for animals in need.

Animals
8
North Carolina Zoological Society Inc

To champion our zoo and its initiatives, wildlife and wild places, with an emphasis on the future.

Animals
9
North Carolina Museum of Life & Science Inc

To create a place of lifelong learning where people, from young child to senior citizen, embrace science as a way of knowing about themselves, their community, and their world.

Arts & Culture
10
North Carolina Council On Economic Education Inc

The nccee provides economic and financial education for educators and students throughout north carolina. this mission is accomplished through standards based workshops and a variety of resources for educators, academic competitions for…

Social Science
11
North Carolina Medical Society

To organize members of the medical profession to advance medical science.

12
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unc Health Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - DUKE UNIVERSITY — $59,000 · OtherTISCH BRAIN TUMOR CENTER - DUKE UNIVERSITYWESTOVER CHURCH — $19,000 · OtherWESTOVER CHURCHTRINITY AME ZION CHURCH — $13,000 · OtherTRINITY AME ZION CHURCHRUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $7,000 · OtherRUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $4,000 · Other+4 more — $5,750 · Other+4 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $54,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC — $10,000 · EducationLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INCUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $9,500 · ReligionFCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $6,000 · Community ImprovementPIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $4,000 · AnimalsOUR WILD NEIGHBORS INC — $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $250 · AnimalsEDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS — $3,000 · Human ServicesNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,000 · International
Other$107,750Education$68,000Religion$9,500Community Improvement$6,000Animals$5,250Human Services$5,000International$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS — $3,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOak Ridge Fire and Rescue Company Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR WILD NEIGHBORS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LEES-MCRAE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds FCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds PIEDMONT WILDLIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds EDUCATE TOMORROW'S PARENTS
  • Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds Oak Ridge Fire and Rescue Company Inc
  • Who funds OUR WILD NEIGHBORS INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIEDMONT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mary Cannon Morris Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph