Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Bremer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$390kEducation$224kArts & Culture$198kYouth Development$111kFood & Nutrition$101kHealth$73kCivil Rights$42kPhilanthropy$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
RANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY FOUDNATION$20,000
NDCME$15,000
BEAVER AREA HS VARSITY FOOTBALL SUP$15,000
Individual grant recipient$11,200
CAPITAL THEATER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WIKEMEDIA FOUNDATION$5,945
KITTITAS COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE$5,000
KEEN$5,000
SPARKS MUSEUM$5,000
KITTITAS COUNTY RECOVERY COMMUNITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ELKS CLUB$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES: $40k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
IL
NY
NV
OH
PA
CA
VA
AZ
NC
DC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$884k · 17 repeat orgs$426k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
48

Total granted

$884k
$340k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+54%

Still filing today

35%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Palm Springs
    7× · 2017–2023 · $91k · revenue +47%
  • OF
    OJAI FESTIVALS LTD
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +15%
  • RC
    Reno Chamber Orchestra Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • RM
    RANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY & OBSERVATORY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +54%
  • WS
    WASHINGTON STSTE INIV HORTICULTURE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
2
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
3
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
4
Tahoe Community Foundation

The Foundation envisions a thriving community created through meaningful philanthropy, inclusive communication, and the willingness to explore possibilities together.

Education
5
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
6
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
7
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
8
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
New Century Chamber Orchestra

New century chamber orchestra, a virtuoso, conductorless string ensemble founded in 1992, presents performances of extraordinary quality in the san francisco bay area with a commitment to innovation, education, and accessibility.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kittitas County Recovery Community Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $148,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBoys & Girls Club of Palm Springs: $91,000 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of Palm SpringsWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY HORTICULTURE CENTER: $90,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY HORTICULTURE CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY FOUDNATION: $50,000 · OtherRANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY FOUDNATIONSENIOR DENTAL CENTER: $45,000 · Other+53 more: $408,201 · Other+53 moreCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLET…+1 more: $1,800 · Human ServicesNDCME: $42,000 · EducationRANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY & OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $1,000 · EducationOJAI FESTIVALS LTD: $50,000 · Arts & CultureReno Chamber Orchestra Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureVILLA MUSICA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGallery One: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBOB BAKER MARIONETTE THEATER: $5,000 · Arts & CultureDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyKITTITAS COUNTY RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $10,000 · HealthThe Trellis Center: $2,500 · HealthFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$892,201Human Services$211,800Education$93,000Arts & Culture$90,000Philanthropy$30,000Health$12,500Food & Nutrition$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $210,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Palm Springs: $91,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetNDCME: $42,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY & OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetReno Chamber Orchestra Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLA MUSICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAKIMA ROTARY CHARITIES: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKITTITAS COUNTY RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGallery One: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBOB BAKER MARIONETTE THEATER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKittitas County Search and Rescue: $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetThe Trellis Center: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,053 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSigma Chi Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Palm Springs ↗
  • Who funds OJAI FESTIVALS LTD ↗
  • Who funds NDCME ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO MIRAGE LIBRARY & OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Reno Chamber Orchestra Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VILLA MUSICA ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YAKIMA ROTARY CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds KITTITAS COUNTY RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Bremer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Bremer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Bremer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph