Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$152kEducation$132kArts & Culture$66kReligion$39kPhilanthropy$34kYouth Development$25kRecreation & Sports$15kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$774k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC$30,000
COMMUNITIES IN THE SCHOOLS OF GREENBRIER CO$16,900
GREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC$9,500
OLD STONE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,000
NEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION$3,000
LEWISBURG LITERARY GROUP$3,000
FAMILY REFUGE CENTER$3,000
GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY COMMUNITY FDN$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS INC: $5k → 18%NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS INC: $5k → 18%NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS INC: $5k → 18%NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS INC: $5k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $5k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $5k → 18%SHEPHERD'S CENTER GREENBRIER VALLEY INC: $5k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $3k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $2k → 18%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $2k → 18%RENICK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 85%.

Mary B Nickell Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$400k · 16 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
18

Total granted

$400k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+6%

Still filing today

63%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +82%
  • NR
    NEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $28k · revenue +16%
  • RA
    READ ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • GC
    GREENBRIER CO COMMISSION ON AGING
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • SC
    SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -7%
  • CH
    CARNEGIE HALL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenbrier Valley Restoration Project Inc

Gvrp, inc. is an entity focused on watershed protection and sustainable community development. gvrp is concentrating its initial efforts in two areas: public fundraising and development of a community center and charitable open space in…

Environment
2
Greenbrier County Committee On Aging Inc

The organization operates a senior citizen's center in greenbrier county west virgnia. senior citizens are provided with transportation, nutrition, in-home care and other personal and social services.

Human Services
3
Greenville Revitalization Corp

To act as the economic development arm of the gcra by bringing economic opportunity to disadvantaged areas of greenville county.

—
4
Greenville Public Library

Working cooperatively with other libraries and agencies, our mission is to provide comprehensive library services to residents of smithfield and surrounding areas, with emphasis on providing a common meeting place, general reference, and…

Education
5
Village of Greenport Bid

To enhance the economic and cultural vitality of the greenport village business district.

Community Improvement
6
Greenville Area Chamber of Commerce

To provide leadership and to promote orderly community development.

—
7
Greater Greenbrier Long-Term Recovery Committee

To ensure the safety and wellbeing of Greenbrier Valley citizens in all phases of disaster.

—
8
Greenbrier Pregnancy Center Inc
—
9
Greene County Veterans Club

To serve as a social club for the military veterans located in waynesburg and the surrounding area.

Public Benefit
10
Greenlawn Centerport Historical Association

The preservation and study of local history

Housing & Shelter
11
Greenville Theatre Arts Center
—
12
Greenbank Mill Associates Inc

Our mission is dedicated to preserving the greenbank mill national historical district as a public museum and expanding public knowledge of red clay vally industrial, agricultural and social hstory through on site educational and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenbrier Historical Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lewisburg Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC: $120,000 · OtherWELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INCCOMMUNITIES IN THE SCHOOLS OF GREENBRIER CO: $69,400 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN THE SCHOOLS OF GREENBRIER COOLD STONE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $36,000 · OtherOLD STONE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHNEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $28,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCREAD ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC: $21,500 · OtherREAD ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INCCARNEGIE HALL INC: $18,000 · OtherGREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER: $14,500 · OtherLEWISBURG LITERARY GROUP INC: $13,000 · Other+17 more: $44,170 · Other+17 moreNORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS: $20,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN G…FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY REF…SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY: $5,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS …RENICK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY: $32,000 · PhilanthropyGREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE HALL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGREENBRIER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,500 · AnimalsAlderson Main Street Inc: $1,940 · Environment
Other$364,570Human Services$44,000Philanthropy$32,000Arts & Culture$25,000Animals$9,500Environment$1,940

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC: $120,000 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetTHE GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY: $32,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $28,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetREAD ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC: $21,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetNORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS: $20,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetCARNEGIE HALL INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $17,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER: $14,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREENBRIER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $9,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCARNEGIE HALL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLewisburg Foundation Incorporated: $2,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAlderson Main Street Inc: $1,940 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER GREENBRIER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds READ ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE HALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds RENICK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Lewisburg Foundation Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Alderson Main Street Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hollowell Dawkins Foundation IncWV36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hollowell Dawkins Foundation Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · The Jeanne G Hamilton and Lawson W Hamilton Jr Family Foundation Inc · Seneca Trail Charitable Foundation · The Greater Greenbrier Valley · Abner & Mildred Levine Family Foundation Inc · Marie Leist Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc · The Daywood Foundationinc · Tgkvf Inc · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary B Nickell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph