Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary and Kathleen Harriman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$295kEducation$277kAnimals$211kEnvironment$115kYouth Development$81kArts & Culture$56kRecreation & Sports$51kCivil Rights$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k34 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $108k
$3,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR DISCOVERY ENDOWMENT FUND INC$21,000
ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORK$18,500
MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$16,000
MOUNTAIN HUMANE$15,000
EAST MAUI ANIMAL REFUGE$14,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
HEMINGWAY PARENTS AUXILIARY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
BROOKLINE FOR RACIAL JUSTICE & EQUITY$8,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$8,000
STEPS TO SUCCESS$8,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$8,000
MJ PROJECT$7,000
ROW NEW YORK$5,000
LITTLE RIVER HEALTH CARE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER: $9k → 16%WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST: $15k → 7%LOYOLA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $11k → 7%CAMFED: $9k → 10%THE MJ PROJECT: $14k → 22%EAST MAUI ANIMAL REFUGE: $14k → 9%COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $15k → 9%CENTER FOR DISCOVERY: $30k → 16%NYU - FACES: $14k → 17%CENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL DBA CARBON180: $9k → 14%LAB RESCUE OF THE LRCP INC: $18k → 6%ONE TREE PLANTED: $18k → 10%RMHS CHORAL BOOSTER CLUB: $13k → 8%SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER: $9k → 16%MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $15k → 7%CAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%THE MJ PROJECT: $14k → 22%TOWN OF TUXEDO: $13k → 14%CENTER FOR DISCOVERY ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $30k → 16%NYU - FACES: $12k → 17%ONE TREE PLANTED: $15k → 10%MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $18k → 8%MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $13k → 7%THE MJ PROJECT: $14k → 22%HAWAII ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR DISCOVERY: $27k → 16%MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $16k → 8%WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST: $12k → 7%HAWAII ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR DISCOVERY: $25k → 16%CHRIST EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $12k → 8%MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $12k → 7%HAWAII ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%TUXEDOWOODBURY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $9k → 14%CENTER FOR DISCOVERY ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $21k → 16%MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $10k → 7%CENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $9k → 14%HEMINGWAY PARENTS AUXILIARY: $11k → 7%HEMINGWAY PARENTS AUXILIARY: $10k → 7%BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $10k → 17%BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $10k → 17%BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $9k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORK: $20k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORK: $19k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORK: $19k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORK: $17k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORK: $15k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
WV
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 55 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
17

Total granted

$1.1M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
0%

Still filing today

65%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHealthPhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $82k · revenue +47%
  • AS
    ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +13%
  • ST
    STEPS TO SUCCESS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $44k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • LR
    LAB RESCUE OF LRCP INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -16%
  • COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -40%
  • RC
    RMHS CHORAL BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Student Conservation Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is WordPlay Connects. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
31/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORK: $88,200 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION GREATER NEW YORKHAWAII PET NETWORK INC: $38,250 · OtherHAWAII PET NETWORK INCTHE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $34,250 · OtherTHE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INCHEMINGWAY PARENTS AUXILIARY: $33,750 · OtherHEMINGWAY PARENTS AUXILIARYNYU - FACES: $31,000 · OtherMAYHEW: $26,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $24,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY MAUI: $23,000 · Other+41 more: $293,300 · Other+41 moreTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $81,500 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR…THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $51,000 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $13,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENT…Little Rivers Health Care Inc: $10,000 · HealthLittle Rivers …EPIC LONG ISLAND INC: $6,600 · HealthThe MJ Project: $53,100 · EducationThe MJ ProjectSTEPS TO SUCCESS INC: $43,750 · EducationSTEPS TO SUCCE…COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $15,000 · EducationCOUNCIL FOR NA…THE SAGE SCHOOL INC: $12,000 · EducationTHE SAGE SCHOO…North Bennet Street School: $10,000 · EducationNorth Bennet S…Davidson College: $8,200 · EducationBROOKLINE FOR RACIAL JUSTICE & EQUITY INC: $8,000 · Education+4 more: $8,500 · Education+4 moreANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $54,000 · AnimalsANIMAL SHELTE…MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $42,000 · AnimalsMONTGOMERY CO…EAST MAUI ANIMAL REFUGE: $21,750 · AnimalsEAST MAUI ANI…LAB RESCUE OF LRCP INCORPORATED: $17,500 · AnimalsLAB RESCUE OF…OLD DOG HAVEN: $5,000 · Animals+1 more: $4,500 · AnimalsWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $42,500 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $17,750 · EnvironmentHANOVER CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · EnvironmentONE TREE PLANTED INC: $33,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $13,500 · PhilanthropyLOS ALTOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $37,500 · Youth DevelopmentTimanous Foundation: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentWordPlay Connects: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$591,750Health$162,600Education$158,550Animals$144,750Environment$75,250Philanthropy$72,000Youth Development$53,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $81,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $54,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe MJ Project: $53,100 over 5y, 39% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $51,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSTEPS TO SUCCESS INC: $43,750 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $42,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $42,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHAWAII PET NETWORK INC: $38,250 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $34,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEMINGWAY PARENTS AUXILIARY: $33,750 over 4y, 20% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $33,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAYHEW: $26,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEAST MAUI ANIMAL REFUGE: $21,750 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetLoyola Elementary School PTA: $18,250 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $17,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $17,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAB RESCUE OF LRCP INCORPORATED: $17,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHANOVER CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $15,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAGE SCHOOL INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTimanous Foundation: $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ALTOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROW NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Bennet Street School: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Rivers Health Care Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDavidson College: $8,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE FOR RACIAL JUSTICE & EQUITY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $6,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEPIC LONG ISLAND INC: $6,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWordPlay Connects: $5,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORD ACADEMY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New School: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary W Harriman FoundationNY22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary W Harriman Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Couch Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary and Kathleen Harriman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary and Kathleen Harriman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Little Rivers Health Care Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Steps to Success Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Montshire Museum of Science Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Brookline Music School Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary and Kathleen Harriman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mary and Kathleen Harriman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary and Kathleen Harriman’s filings →

More from the funding graph