Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Loyola Elementary School PTA

Loyola Elementary School PTA (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $368,879 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($240,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 94% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$217k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$369k
Net assets
$176k
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%
01What it does

What Loyola Elementary School PTA does

Mission

The Parent Teacher Association (PTA) is the nations oldest, largest, and highest profile volunteer organization working on behalf of public schools, children, and families. The Loyola Elementary School PTA works to support students, staff and parents.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The PTA funds school materials and supplies such as classroom materials, instructional curriculum, library books, playground and sports equipment, art supplies. This provides materials necessary for teachers to educate and improve the health and welfare of students.

    $72,622 spent
    40% of program spending
  2. The PTA provides support for student and community enrichment programs, including life skills classes, positive behavior and support curriculum, drama, Junior Olympics, Family Fun activities, and other community building events.

    $49,880 spent$30,524 earned by the program
    27% of program spending
  3. The PTA funds student programs including music, dance and drama.

    $45,242 spent
    25% of program spending
  4. The PTA funds technology purchases as well as supplies and maintenance to enable students to take advantage of computer assisted learning activities.

    $15,713 spent
    9% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $183,457.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($221k) Expenses 100 ($220k) Net assets 100 ($95k)2018 Revenue 109 ($242k) Expenses 102 ($225k) Net assets 117 ($112k)2019 Revenue 109 ($241k) Expenses 114 ($250k) Net assets 107 ($102k)2020 Revenue 88 ($195k) Expenses 69 ($152k) Net assets 152 ($145k)2021 Revenue 32 ($71k) Expenses 48 ($106k) Net assets 116 ($110k)2022 Revenue 64 ($141k) Expenses 68 ($151k) Net assets 105 ($100k)2023 Revenue 86 ($191k) Expenses 63 ($139k) Net assets 159 ($152k)2024 Revenue 82 ($181k) Expenses 82 ($181k) Net assets 159 ($151k)2025 Revenue 98 ($217k) Expenses 87 ($192k) Net assets 185 ($176k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (98)Expenses (87)Net assets (185)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $100k to $152k (+51%).

$95k
$112k
$102k
$145k
$110k
$100k
$152k
$151k
$176k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$747
’17
$16k
’18
−$9k
’19
$43k
’20
−$35k
’21
−$10k
’22
$51k
’23
−$387
’24
$25k
’25
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed141313121210101312
Joined·+5+1+6+6+4+3+5+4
No longer listed·61766325
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $2k → $14k.

4 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 94% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Loyola Elementary School PTA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Loyola Elementary School PTA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 65% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Loyola Elementary School PTA.

65%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 86% · 2020 69% · 2021 50% · 2022 83% · 2023 99% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

94% of Loyola Elementary School PTA's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $21k that is directly attributable, 88% of it comes from funders outside California, across 2 states.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’20
’21
’22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $348k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like Loyola Elementary School PTA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 4%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Loyola Elementary School PTA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Loyola Elementary School PTA?
Loyola Elementary School PTA (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $368,879 to it, the largest being MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ($240,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 94% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Loyola Elementary School PTA have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $368,879 in grants to Loyola Elementary School PTA, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Loyola Elementary School PTA?
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC is the largest funder on record, with $240,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Loyola Elementary School PTA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Loyola Elementary School PTA →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing