Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary and Daniel Dolan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$312k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.6MHealth$966kRecreation & Sports$489kPhilanthropy$114kHuman Services$36kPublic Benefit$15kArts & Culture$10kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $154k
$2,098
Median grant
7
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE FOREST COLLEGE$103,750
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB$50,000
METROSQUASH$49,000
US SQUASH$25,000
JAKE OWEN FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
EVANS SCHOLAR FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
VNA FOUNDATION$10,000
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$5,000
US OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION$2,098
NORTH CHICAGO COMMUNITY PARTNERS$1,500
JESTER FOUNDATION$1,000
THE DURHAM MUSEUM$1,000
HSS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JAKE OWEN FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%JAKE OWEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%JAKE OWEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%1916 FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
TN
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 31 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
26

Total granted

$3.3M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+15%

Still filing today

68%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPublic BenefitRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Lake Forest College
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +73%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    7× · 2018–2025 · $816k · revenue +41%
  • VF
    VNA FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $72k · revenue +105% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • CJ
    CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
3
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
4
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
5
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
10
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
11
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jake Owen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/38
Grantees still filing
25/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lake Forest College: $1,041,250 · EducationLake Forest College+4 more: $18,100 · EducationRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $816,066 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Ch…VNA FOUNDATION INC: $72,270 · HealthVNA FOUNDATION INC+5 more: $15,500 · HealthUS SQUASH: $473,875 · OtherUS SQUASHIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $58,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUND…Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $50,000 · OtherAccess Living of Metropolit…Individual grant recipient: $43,250 · OtherEVANS SCHOLAR FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Other+34 more: $99,104 · Other+34 moreMETROSQUASH NFP: $482,355 · Recreation & SportsMETROSQUASH NFP+2 more: $2,598 · Recreation & SportsMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJake Owen Foundation: $26,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $6,500 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE: $1,350 · Public Benefit+1 more: $350 · Public Benefit
Education$1,059,350Health$903,836Other$834,229Recreation & Sports$484,953Philanthropy$55,000Human Services$26,500Public Benefit$15,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLake Forest College: $1,041,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $816,066 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMETROSQUASH NFP: $482,355 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetVNA FOUNDATION INC: $72,270 over 7y, 31% of budgetMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJake Owen Foundation: $26,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFREEDOM GOLF ASSOCIATION: $10,772 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetROCHESTER FRIENDLY HOME: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Chicago Community Partners: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO SHAKESPEARE THEATER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH 360: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHistory Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff: $425 over 4y, 0.0% of budget716 Squash Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds METROSQUASH NFP ↗
  • Who funds VNA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLYING GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Jake Owen Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER FRIENDLY HOME ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds North Chicago Community Partners ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE THANC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Keystone Charitable FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Keystone Charitable Foundation · Hunter Family Foundation · Hunter Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · United Way Worldwide · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary and Daniel Dolan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary and Daniel Dolan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary and Daniel Dolan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph