Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hunter Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2018
56
Grants FY2018
14
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Education$1.6MHealth$1.0MCivil Rights$1.0MEnvironment$265kYouth Development$140kArts & Culture$128kReligion$125kEmployment$125kOther$0
02FY2018 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k16 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $538k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $930k
$22,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHOENIX PACT FUND ATTN CHRI KELLY PRESIDENT$600,000
METROSQUASH$330,000
NORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE PREP HS$175,000
BERNIE'S BOOKS BOOK BANK DONATIONS$145,000
ROOM TO READ$140,000
IMENTOR$125,000
JOURNEYCARE FOUNDATION$100,000
BRIDGES TO PROSPERITY$100,000
ERIE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$100,000
BUILD ON$75,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CHICAGO$75,000
YOUTH BUILD LAKE COUNTY$65,000
NORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK$60,000
RARE$50,000
WASHINGTON NATIONAL CATHEDRAL$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 36 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
1

Total granted

$3.6M
$500k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $713k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    ROOM TO READ
    2× · 2017–2018 · $250k · revenue +23%
  • EF
    Erie Family Health Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +114%
  • R
    RARE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $80k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • LF
    LAKE FOREST NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $500k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
2
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

3
Lake Forest Academy

Lake forest academy strives to embody in its practices - and to cultivate in its students -excellence of character, scholarship, citizenship, and responsibility.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Buckley Country Day School

The school's mission is grounded in the belief expressed by b. lord buckley that opening the eyes and awakening the mind is the essence of education. guided by that mission for almost a century, buckley has purposely focused on developing…

Education
10
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
11
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youthbuild Lake County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Johann Fust Library Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 SchoolsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Public Library SupportFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity FoundationsYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Classical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts OrganizationsHomeless Services & ShelterLand Conservation Organizat…Elementary Literacy TutoringCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%5%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr15%34%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr22%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr15%56%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr22%15%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,317

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
34/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHOENIX PACT FUND ATTN CHRI KELLY PRESIDENT — $1,000,000 · OtherPHOENIX PACT FUND ATTN CHRI KELLY PRESIDENTLAKE FOREST NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL — $500,000 · OtherLAKE FOREST NORTHWESTERN HOSPITALNORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE PREP HS — $375,000 · OtherNORTH LAWNDALE COLLEGE PREP HSBERNIE'S BOOKS BOOK BANK DONATIONS — $295,000 · OtherBERNIE'S BOOKS BOOK BANK DONATIONS+29 more — $1,023,000 · Other+29 moreROOM TO READ — $250,000 · EducationROOM TO R…Colby-Sawyer College — $50,000 · EducationColby-Saw…TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $40,000 · EducationTRUSTEES …North Chicago Community Partners — $22,500 · EducationNorth Chi…TABOR ACADEMY — $20,000 · EducationTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL — $15,000 · Education+2 more — $20,000 · EducationMETROSQUASH NFP — $380,000 · Recreation & SportsMETROSQUA…AQUANUT WATER SHOWS INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsErie Family Health Center Inc — $200,000 · HealthPADS Lake County Inc — $50,000 · HealthKIDS FIRST HEALTH CARE — $25,000 · HealthRARE — $80,000 · EnvironmentLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION — $60,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $25,000 · EnvironmentBRUSHWOOD CENTER AT RYERSON WOODS — $20,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentGASPARILLA ISL CONSER & IMPROVE ASSN — $10,000 · EnvironmentBARRIER ISLAND PARKS SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentIMENTOR INC — $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentREADING POWER INC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC — $65,000 · EmploymentNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $60,000 · Employment
Other$3,193,000Education$417,500Recreation & Sports$395,000Health$275,000Environment$225,000Youth Development$155,000Employment$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMETROSQUASH NFP — $380,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetROOM TO READ — $250,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetErie Family Health Center Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIMENTOR INC — $125,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRARE — $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC — $65,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetHistory Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff — $65,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $60,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION — $60,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetColby-Sawyer College — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $43,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES — $40,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREADING POWER INC — $30,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS FIRST HEALTH CARE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNorth Chicago Community Partners — $22,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTABOR ACADEMY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRUSHWOOD CENTER AT RYERSON WOODS — $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGorton Community Center — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetELAWA FARM FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAQUANUT WATER SHOWS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRIER ISLAND PARKS SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBOCA GRANDE WOMAN'S CLUB INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL YEAR ABROAD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHANN FUST LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY & FAMILY RESOURCES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hunter Family FoundationIL47.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hunter Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Buchanan Family Foundation · Red Bird Hollow Foundation · Clarks Fork Foundation · The Gorter Family Foundation · Butler Family Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · Harold M & Adeline S Morrison Family Foundation · Hedberg Foundation Inc · The Grainger Foundation Inc · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hunter Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hunter Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hunter Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph