Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$317k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$248kReligion$187kHuman Services$170kInternational$145kPublic Benefit$85kHousing & Shelter$54kFood & Nutrition$41kHealth$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
$4,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$64,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$60,000
LCMS WORD RELIEF$25,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$24,000
HOLY CROSS MISSION CENTER$10,000
FRIENDSHIP HOUSE$10,000
FRANCISCAN MISSION$10,000
USA FOR UNHCR$10,000
SKAGIT VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$6,000
MERCY CORP$6,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$6,000
CMMB$6,000
ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER$6,000
LIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES$6,000
WHITE CENTER FOOD ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
OR
IA
IN
CT
CA
MO
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 38 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+186%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    4× · 2021–2024 · $64k · revenue +64%
  • MB
    MERCY BEYOND BORDERS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $21k · revenue +109%
  • Mercy Ships International
    3× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CT
    CALL TO SERVE AS CHRIST CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • BH
    BETHLEHEM HOLY CHILD PROGRAMgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +186%
  • PP
    PREPARES PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
3
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
4
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
5
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
6
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
7
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Skagit Valley College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $240,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $149,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $92,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $40,000 · Other+34 more: $341,301 · Other+34 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $64,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES …United States Association for UNHCR: $35,000 · InternationalUnited States …MERCY BEYOND BORDERS: $21,000 · InternationalMERCY BEYOND B…Mercy Ships International: $12,000 · InternationalMercy Ships In…BETHLEHEM HOLY CHILD PROGRAM: $9,000 · InternationalBETHLEHEM HOLY…WORLD VISION INC: $7,000 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalANACORTES FAMILY CENTER: $22,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterSkagit Valley College Foundation: $24,000 · EducationCOVENANT HOUSE: $8,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,900 · HealthFOOD LIFELINE: $7,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$937,301International$150,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Education$24,000Human Services$15,500Health$8,900Food & Nutrition$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $64,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSkagit Valley College Foundation: $24,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetANACORTES FAMILY CENTER: $22,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMERCY BEYOND BORDERS: $21,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOOD BANK: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMACDONALD CENTER: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOLY CHILD PROGRAM: $9,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetINTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER: $9,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds Skagit Valley College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MERCY BEYOND BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds MACDONALD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HOLY CHILD PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOMMUNITY PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS HOUSING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Norcliffe Foundation · Jerry H Walton Foundation · The Skagit Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph