Skip to content
Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.8MEducation$560kPhilanthropy$103kRecreation & Sports$20kYouth Development$15kHealth$7kReligion$600Environment$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$512
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA$10,000
OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
OMAHA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY$3,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%ST THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $500 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $10k → 13%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 22%THE KENNEDY CENTER: $430k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $20k → 13%NORTHWESTERN HILLEL: $1k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200 → 7%CUES FUND: $500 → 12%THE KENNEDY CENTER: $298k → 14%OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%THE KENNEDY CENTER: $220k → 14%OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $200 → 12%THE KENNEDY CENTER: $200k → 14%COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $167k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $500k → 12%HERITAGE OMAHA: $25k → 12%JOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $150k → 12%OMAHA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY: $3k → 12%UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $20k → 12%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA: $2k → 12%NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT: $15k → 12%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA: $2k → 12%CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $13k → 12%CREIGHTON PREPATORY SCHOOL: $100 → 12%WORLD-HERALD GOODFELLOWS CHARITIES INC: $3k → 12%CREIGHTON PREPATORY SCHOOL: $100 → 12%KANEKO: $1k → 12%TEMPLE ISRAEL: $100 → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $30k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $30k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $10k → 12%FILM STREAMS INC: $10k → 12%ST ROBERT BELLARMINE: $200 → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $15k → 12%ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2k → 12%ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 4 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
19

Total granted

$1.2M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-3%

Still filing today

75%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    THE KENNEDY-WARREN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue -5%
  • OC
    ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +12%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • OP
    OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $360k · revenue -16%
  • CI
    COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $167k · revenue -61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Opera Omaha Inc

Enriching the quality of life in the community by creating professional opera and music theater, which uniquely combine the visual and performing arts to express humanity's deepest emotions and highest aspirations.

Arts & Culture
2
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
3
Omaha Sports Commission

The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.

Recreation & Sports
4
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
5
Omaha Children's Museum

Omaha children's museum is a not-for-profit organization that provides children and families with opportunities to discover how the world works, challenge themselves, and learn through play. the mission of the museum is to engage the…

Arts & Culture
6
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
7
Omaha Economic Development Corporation

The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.

—
8
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
9
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
10
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
11
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
12
Museum of Nebraska Art

The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Cultural Endowment; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE KENNEDY-WARREN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,147,780 · Community ImprovementTHE KENNEDY-WARREN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INCOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $500,000 · Arts & CultureOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIET…JOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $150,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUM+3 more: $4,200 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $360,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA F…COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $166,667 · EducationCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TR…+2 more: $22,878 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $70,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $20,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT: $15,000 · PhilanthropyOmaha Community Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $20,000 · OtherFILM STREAMS INC: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $10,000 · OtherONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $3,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $3,000 · Other+7 more: $4,700 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 · HealthCUES FUND: $500 · Religion
Community Improvement$1,147,780Arts & Culture$654,200Education$549,545Philanthropy$115,000Other$75,700Youth Development$15,000Health$500Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY: $500,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $360,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $166,667 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $12,878 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY: $3,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKANEKO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUES FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationThe Sherwood Foundati…Jewish Federation of …The Holland FoundationThe Charles and Mary …Robert B Daugherty Fo…Phillip and Terri Sch…Harley and Beth Schra…The Fred and Eve Simo…Annette and Paul Smit…Weitz Family Foundati…Nebraska Community Fo…
The Lozier FoundationNE28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Phillip and Terri Schrager Foundation · Harley and Beth Schrager Foundation · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund · Weitz Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martha and David Slosburg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home