· Private foundation
Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $5k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA | $10,000 |
| OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| OMAHA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY | $3,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -2% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TKTHE KENNEDY-WARREN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue -5%
- OCONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue -2%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- OPOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -3%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $360k · revenue -16%
- CICOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUSTone grant, 2022 · $167k · revenue -61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enriching the quality of life in the community by creating professional opera and music theater, which uniquely combine the visual and performing arts to express humanity's deepest emotions and highest aspirations.
One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.
The mission of the omaha sports commission is to foster a positive socio-economic impact on and a heightened awareness and image of omaha by attracting, hosting, & supporting amateur sporting events.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
Omaha children's museum is a not-for-profit organization that provides children and families with opportunities to discover how the world works, challenge themselves, and learn through play. the mission of the museum is to engage the…
We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.
The mission of oedc is to implement economic development projects, housing, and community revitalization programs that create jobs, business ownership opportunities and other economic benefits for area residents.
Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.
Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members
The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.
The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.
The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Cultural Endowment and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE KENNEDY-WARREN RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
- Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds OMAHA CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds KANEKO ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds CUES FUND ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Phillip and Terri Schrager Foundation · Harley and Beth Schrager Foundation · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund · Weitz Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.