Skip to content
Marshall Foundation for Community Health at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Marshall Foundation for Community Health

See schedule oto encourage and receive charitable contributions, and to responsibly administer and disburse those funds in support of marshall and community health programs.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.1MHuman Services$36kYouth Development$22kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $812,034, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,244,849 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $432,815 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $250k+1 grant · $800k
$6,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER$800,234
THE ALS ASSOCIATION$6,500
BABY FRIENDLY USA INC$5,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Snowline Hospice EDC: $5k → 8%MOTHER LODE REHAB ENT: $25k → 8%MOTHER LODE REHABILITATION: $5k → 8%NEW MORNING YOUTH & FAMILY: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 6 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +63% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$3.9M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+63%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +39%
  • EL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +88%
  • PH
    PROGRESS HOUSE INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $14k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • IO
    IMAGES OF HOPE EL DORADO
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue -9%
  • SC
    SIERRA CHAPLAINCY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -57%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE-FREE RELATIONSHIPS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
2
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
3
El Dorado County Fair Association

To provide the county fair; to provide facilities for community; and to promote general public education and awareness of agriculture in the community.

—
4
Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation

To nurture the spirit of generosity and volunteerism of the community, we focus our philanthropic efforts in fostering quality healthcare of the highest standards for Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital.

Health
5
El Dorado County Humane Society

Care for shelter animals, provide public with free spay/neuter services, educational outreach.

Animals
6
Lodi Memorial Hospital Association Inc

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
7
Anderson Valley Health Center Inc

To provide comprehensive, affordable medical, psychiatric and health-related services to the community's most vulnerable populations, regardless of income.

Health
8
Oroville Hospital

Oroville Hospital is dedicated to always providing the finest personalized healthcare to Oroville and the surrounding foothill and valley communities by offering a medical home with a wide range of integrated services, from prevention…

Health
9
Adventist Health Delano

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness, and hope.

Health
10
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
11
El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Improving the health of our community through comprehensive, accessible, affordable, quality, and compassionate care.

Health
12
Jobs Shelters of the Sierra

Provide relief for the unhoused residents of El Dorado County

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Dorado Community Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Baby Friendly Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER: $3,848,347 · HealthMARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER+4 more: $45,420 · HealthMother Lode Rehabilitation Enterprises Inc: $30,791 · Human ServicesSNOWLINE HEALTH: $5,391 · Human ServicesNEW MORNING YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5,391 · Human ServicesEL DORADO HIGH SCHOOL: $13,000 · OtherSIERRA CHAPLAINCY: $5,465 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE-FREE RELATIONSHIPS: $5,391 · OtherEl Dorado Community Foundation: $20,000 · PhilanthropyYOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $11,391 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO COUNTY WESTERN SLOPE: $5,391 · Youth DevelopmentIMAGES OF HOPE EL DORADO: $8,920 · Arts & CultureCASA EL DORADO: $5,391 · Crime & Legal
Health$3,893,767Human Services$41,573Other$23,856Philanthropy$20,000Youth Development$16,782Arts & Culture$8,920Crime & Legal$5,391

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER: $3,848,347 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMother Lode Rehabilitation Enterprises Inc: $30,791 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEl Dorado Community Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROGRESS HOUSE INC: $13,620 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $11,391 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetIMAGES OF HOPE EL DORADO: $8,920 over 1y, 12% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CHAPLAINCY: $5,465 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE-FREE RELATIONSHIPS: $5,391 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSNOWLINE HEALTH: $5,391 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO COUNTY WESTERN SLOPE: $5,391 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW MORNING YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5,391 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA EL DORADO: $5,391 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Com…El Dorado Community F…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · El Dorado Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshall Foundation for Community Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshall Foundation for Community Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshall Foundation for Community Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home