· Public charity
Marshall Foundation for Community Health
See schedule othe foundation encourages, receives, administers and disburses donated funds for community health programs and marshall medical center.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $184,162 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $270,881 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $86,719 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER | $175,242 |
| IMAGES OF HOPE | $8,920 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +39%
EL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +88%- PHPROGRESS HOUSE INC2× · 2018–2019 · $14k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- SCSIERRA CHAPLAINCYone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -57%
- CECASA EL DORADOgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +119%
- NMNEW MORNING YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Care for shelter animals, provide public with free spay/neuter services, educational outreach.
Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.
Create and promote affordable housing solutions and support services that nurture individuals and families while encouraging self-sufficiency on the Western Slope of El Dorado County.
Provide relief for the unhoused residents of El Dorado County
To provide the county fair; to provide facilities for community; and to promote general public education and awareness of agriculture in the community.
East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.
Labor organization to protect and promote member interests in contract negotiations; provide legal coverage; conflict counsel representation and LTD Insurance coverage; promote goodwill in the local community by providing charitable…
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
Mental health services
Oroville Hospital is dedicated to always providing the finest personalized healthcare to Oroville and the surrounding foothill and valley communities by offering a medical home with a wide range of integrated services, from prevention…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Dorado Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Sierra Chaplaincy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Mother Lode Rehabilitation Enterprises Inc ↗
- Who funds El Dorado Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds EL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROGRESS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE ↗
- Who funds IMAGES OF HOPE EL DORADO ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CHAPLAINCY ↗
- Who funds CASA EL DORADO ↗
- Who funds NEW MORNING YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EL DORADO COUNTY WESTERN SLOPE ↗
- Who funds SNOWLINE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE-FREE RELATIONSHIPS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · El Dorado Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marshall Foundation for Community Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.