Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marketaxess Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$159k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$401kEducation$270kCommunity Improvement$220kPublic Safety & Disaster$121kEmployment$97kPhilanthropy$75kHuman Services$55kHealth$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$22,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American National Red Cross$51,900
Empower- The Emerging Market Foundation$25,000
City Harvest Inc$22,000
City Harvest LTD$20,000
IntoUniversity$20,000
Girls Who Code$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 69% of grant dollars ($950k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 31% that went abroad ($437k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $248k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American National Red Cross: $61k → 14%American National Red Cross: $60k → 14%Rising Ground: $5k → 20%American National Red Cross: $52k → 14%Girls Who Code: $25k → 17%Girls Who Code: $20k → 17%The Orphaned Starfish Foundation: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 31% of all-years giving ($437k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$437k · 12 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+28%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2022–2025 · $173k · revenue +23%
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue +40%
  • EE
    EMPOWER-THE EMERGING MARKETS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2025 · $50k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +9%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Cristo Rey Brooklyn High School

Cristo rey brooklyn is a catholic high school partnering with families of all creeds to educate deserving young people from underserved communities to become men and women of faith, purpose, and service. by integrating a rigorous…

—
6
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Speros Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City Harvest LTD: $278,250 · OtherCity Harvest LTDIntoUniversity: $106,706 · OtherIntoUniversityEast London Advanced Technology Training: $91,594 · OtherEast London Advanced Technology TrainingFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $25,000 · OtherCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC: $25,000 · OtherBRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherCITY HARVEST INC: $342,730 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $173,108 · Human ServicesAmerican National …GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INCOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesOrphaned Starfish …+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesPENCIL INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyPENCIL INCROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUND…SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $30,500 · HealthAUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $12,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthEMPOWER-THE EMERGING MARKETS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · International
Other$551,550Food & Nutrition$342,730Human Services$248,108Philanthropy$225,000Education$75,000Health$53,000International$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $342,730 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $173,108 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENCIL INC: $150,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER-THE EMERGING MARKETS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $30,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPEROS HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetRISING GROUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Pinkerton Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marketaxess Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marketaxess Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marketaxess Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Marketaxess Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marketaxess’ filings →

    More from the funding graph