Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mark & Susan Grimme Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$54kHuman Services$46kPhilanthropy$42kReligion$7kAnimals$7kEducation$3kCommunity Improvement$2kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC$35,000
BLUE GRASS CARE NAVIGATORS$17,500
KINGSOMS CREW$15,000
ST THOMAS CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$9,500
MILESTONES INC$3,750
THE BEAT GOES ON$3,750
CATHOLIC BISHOPS OF NORTHERN ALASKA$2,000
BRIGHTON CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CARENET PREGNANCY SERVICES$1,000
DCCH$1,000
ALS ASSOCIATION$500
ST BERNARD FOOD PANTRY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BLUE GRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $18k → 7%SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC: $35k → 11%BLUE GRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $8k → 7%SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC: $5k → 11%KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $2k → 16%KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 15 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$122k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
-17%

Still filing today

47%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +63%
  • HO
    Hospice of the Bluegrass Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • BC
    Brighton Center Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • BC
    BLUGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • PF
    PAWS FOR MILES
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Faithful Friends Ky Inc

Nursing home ministry

Health
2
Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus of Kentucky

The carmelite sisters of the divine heart of jesus of kentucky strive to maintain our home as a true home away from home for our residents. our residents are senior citizens and disabled residents.

—
3
Have a Heart Inc
Education
4
Kentmere Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Inc

The organization's mission is to provide residential facilities and medical services for residents. to maintain a home for older adults, which provides the highest quality of short and long term health care.

Human Services
5
Jenkins Memorial Nursing Home Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

—
6
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
7
Pathways Adult Living Inc

Successfully provide assisted living facilities for mentally ill adults

Health
8
Adult Enrichment Centers Inc

At Adult Enrichment Centers, we engage adults of all abilities in community programs that promote inclusion and independence.

Human Services
9
Canterbury Place

Skilled nursing, long term and personal care

Housing & Shelter
10
Transitions At Home Inc

Our mission is to serve elderly and disabled individuals by providing quality health care and personal care services at home to enhance the lives of those we serve and help them stay safely at home longer.

Health
11
Christian Care Communities Inc

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual. christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living, 24-hour skilled nursing…

—
12
Counterpoint Inc

Counterpoint offers intensive and standard work/day services and supported employment services. Counterpoint also offers three types of residential services: intensive group home, standard group home, and independent living supports.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carmel Manor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Catholic Urban Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST THOMAS CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $26,500 · OtherST THOMAS CAPITAL CAMPAIGNIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBLUGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS: $7,500 · OtherBLUGRASS CARE NAVIGATORSCATHOLIC BISHOPS OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $4,000 · OtherCARENET PREGNANCY SERVICES: $3,500 · OtherBrighton Center Inc: $3,000 · OtherGREATER LIBERTY BAPTIST CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherNEW PERCEPTIONS INC: $3,000 · Other+11 more: $12,500 · Other+11 moreSAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC: $40,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINICHospice of the Bluegrass Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the Bluegrass IncKEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $3,000 · Human ServicesKINGDOMS CREW: $15,000 · PhilanthropyKINGDOMS CR…The Beat Goes On: $3,750 · PhilanthropyThe Beat Go…PAWS FOR MILES: $6,000 · AnimalsMILESTONES INC: $3,750 · HealthCARMEL MANOR INC: $1,500 · HealthALLIANCE FOR CATHOLIC URBAN EDUCATION INC: $3,000 · Education
Other$83,000Human Services$68,000Philanthropy$18,750Animals$6,000Health$5,250Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC: $40,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHospice of the Bluegrass Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOMS CREW: $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPAWS FOR MILES: $6,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetMILESTONES INC: $3,750 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBrighton Center Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW PERCEPTIONS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARMEL MANOR INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC & MEMORY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN CAR CARE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Bluegrass Inc ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOMS CREW ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR MILES ↗
  • Who funds MILESTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Beat Goes On ↗
  • Who funds KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Brighton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW PERCEPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARMEL MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC & MEMORY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500KY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500 · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc · The Butler Foundation · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig · The Fischer Family Foundation 2008 · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mark & Susan Grimme Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mark & Susan Grimme Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mark & Susan Grimme Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph