Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mark and Karen Gergel Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$142kReligion$68kFood & Nutrition$25kHuman Services$19kAnimals$10kRecreation & Sports$9kEducation$9kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,250
Median grant
12
States reached
$356k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Vincent DePaul Georgia$10,000
Reclif Community$6,000
St Christine Christian Services$5,000
Caron Treatment Center$5,000
Blessed Trinity Catholic Church$3,600
Kennesaw State Athletic Association$3,525
The Channing's Joy Foundation$3,000
Open Door Food Pantry$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Mighty Millie Foundation$2,500
St Jude's Childrens Hospital$2,000
Good News Church$2,000
Freeport Middle School$1,250
Pregnancy Aid Center$1,250
Pacific Whale Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Link: $2k → 11%The Link: $2k → 11%The Link: $1k → 11%Caring & Sharing of South Walton: $7k → 11%The Bridge for Youth: $1k → 11%Caring & Sharing of South Walton: $6k → 11%The Bridge for Youth: $1k → 11%Caring & Sharing of South Walton: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
PA
CT
CA
KY
MD
TN
NC
HI
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216k · 26 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$216k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+1%

Still filing today

54%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CARING & SHARING OF SOUTH WALTON INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $14k · revenue +62%
  • SC
    ST CHRISTINE CHRISTIAN SERVICES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +3%
  • TK
    THE KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHORELINE CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • NR
    NEURODIVERSITY RESOURCE OF THE PANHANDLE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
3
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
4
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of Ne Wi Inc

Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.

Health
5
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
6
Daniela Conte Foundation Inc

The daniela conte foundation fights childhood cancer by providing financial assistance to families of kids with cancer, funding pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma research, and advocating for increased funding and awareness. the foundation also…

Health
7
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
8
Midwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer Inc

Midwest athletes against childhood cancer, inc.'s mission is to find a cure for childhood cancer and related blood disorders by providing critical funding for research.

Health
9
Alexs Lemonade Stand Foundation

The foundation's purpose is to change the lives of children with cancer through funding impactful research, raising awareness, supporting families, and empowering everyone to help cure childhood cancer.

—
10
Pediatric Cancer Research Foundation

Fund research to power cures that reduce the percentage of children who perish from cancer until that number reaches zero.

—
11
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
12
Alcides E Rosaura Diniz Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds and foster basic and translational research to identify genetic causes of specific cancers, understand how genes contribute to the disease, and use that understanding to help develop better…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central & Northern Florida; the most unlike its peers is National Dance Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHORELINE CHURCH INC: $55,000 · OtherSHORELINE CHURCH INCSt Vincent DePaul Georgia: $23,500 · OtherSt Vincent DePaul GeorgiaCaron Treatment Center: $20,000 · OtherCaron Treatment CenterBlessed Trinity Catholic Church: $6,100 · OtherCAMP SUNSHINE INC: $6,000 · OtherThe Empty Stocking Fund: $6,000 · Other+30 more: $50,800 · Other+30 moreRECLIF COMMUNITY INC: $56,380 · HealthRECLIF COMMUNITY INCTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $4,500 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING …MIGHTY MILLIE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Health+5 more: $3,500 · HealthNEURODIVERSITY RESOURCE OF THE PANHANDLE INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyNEURODIVE…THE KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $6,025 · PhilanthropyTHE KENNE…HOPE FOR AUTUMN FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE FOR …THE CHANNINGS JOY FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CHANN…VERA BRADLEY FOUNDATION FOR BREAST CANCER INC: $1,431 · PhilanthropyVERA BRAD…CARING & SHARING OF SOUTH WALTON INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesTHE LINK: $4,500 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $2,000 · Human ServicesST CHRISTINE CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $13,000 · ReligionPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $5,800 · EnvironmentThe Launch Pad Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$167,400Health$66,880Philanthropy$25,456Human Services$20,500Religion$13,000Environment$5,800Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRECLIF COMMUNITY INC: $56,380 over 4y, 12% of budgetCARING & SHARING OF SOUTH WALTON INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetST CHRISTINE CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $13,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNEURODIVERSITY RESOURCE OF THE PANHANDLE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $6,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FOR AUTUMN FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $5,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Launch Pad Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE LINK: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHANNINGS JOY FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTY MILLIE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERA BRADLEY FOUNDATION FOR BREAST CANCER INC: $1,431 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY AID CENTERS INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITCH IN FOR BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMERALD COAST CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERALD COAST THEATRE COMPANY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALETHAS LEGACY INC: $800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANCERS AGAINST CANCER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN FLORIDA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RECLIF COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING & SHARING OF SOUTH WALTON INC ↗
  • Who funds ST CHRISTINE CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEURODIVERSITY RESOURCE OF THE PANHANDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR AUTUMN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Launch Pad Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE LINK ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHANNINGS JOY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIGHTY MILLIE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds VERA BRADLEY FOUNDATION FOR BREAST CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY AID CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PITCH IN FOR BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ↗
  • Who funds EMERALD COAST CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The St Joe Community Foundation IncFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The St Joe Community Foundation Inc · The Alys Foundationinc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mark and Karen Gergel Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mark and Karen Gergel Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mark and Karen Gergel Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mark and Karen Gergel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mark and Karen Gergel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph