Skip to content
Marjorie Moore Charitable Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Marjorie Moore Charitable Fdn

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$182k
Granted FY2026still arriving
17
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$253kReligion$162kArts & Culture$155kEducation$139kHealth$127kCrime & Legal$28kEnvironment$15kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $142k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BERLIN FREE LIBRARY$25,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$25,000
KLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS INC$15,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SW NEW ENGLAND$15,000
FUTURES INC$15,000
PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR WOMEN INC$15,000
RICHARD D HUBBARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$12,000
NEW BRITAIN INSTITUTE$10,000
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$10,000
NEW BRITAIN SYMPHONY SOCIETY$8,000
NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$5,000
ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT$5,000
CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC$5,000
CHILDREN IN PLACEMENT$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF HTFD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FUTURES INC: $15k → 7%FUTURES INC: $5k → 7%FUTURES INC: $5k → 7%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $15k → 11%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $15k → 11%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $13k → 11%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR: $10k → 11%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR: $5k → 11%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR: $5k → 11%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR: $5k → 11%PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR: $5k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE OF CENTRAL CONNECTICUT: $25k → 11%COVENANT TO CARE INC: $5k → 11%FOR ALL AGES INC: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$887k · 27 repeat orgs$244k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2026, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
18

Total granted

$887k
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

52%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AFFILIATES INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $88k · revenue +4%
  • PC
    PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $73k · revenue +30%
  • NB
    NEW BRITAIN INSTITUTE
    5× · 2019–2026 · $43k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • NP
    Neighborhood Promise Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -46%
  • BV
    BERLIN VISITING NURSE ASSN
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • BP
    BERLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocates of Connecticut Inc

Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.

—
2
Connecticut Citizen Action Group Inc

We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.

—
3
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
4
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
5
Connecticut Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.

Crime & Legal
6
The Connecticut Project Inc

The connecticut project, a 501c3 organization, brings together people, ideas, and resources to build opportunity.

Community Improvement
7
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
8
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
9
Connecticut Legal Rights Project Inc

The primary exempt purpose of ct legal rights project, inc. is to provide legal representation and advocacy for low income adults with psychiatric disabilities.

Unclassified
10
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement
11
The Connecticut Center for Nursing Workforce Inc

To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.

Health
12
Capitol Child Development Center Inc

Non-profit organization which was founded by the state of ct general assembly as a model for employer - sponsored childcare programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children in Placement Inc; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Promise Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENSINGTON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherKENSINGTON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AFFILIATES INC: $88,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AFFILIATES INCKLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS INC: $65,000 · OtherKLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS INCFAMILY PROMISE OF CENTRAL CT: $50,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF CENTRAL CTNEW BRITAIN INSTITUTE: $42,500 · OtherNEW BRITAIN INSTITUTECHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC: $42,500 · OtherCHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE: $39,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SW NEW ENGLAND: $37,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHWEST: $35,000 · Other+26 more: $290,460 · Other+26 morePRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $72,500 · Human ServicesPRUDENCE CRAN…Neighborhood Promise Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood …FUTURES INCORPORATED: $25,000 · Human ServicesFUTURES INCOR…COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,782 · Human ServicesARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT: $40,000 · Arts & CultureARTS FOR LEA…NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureNEW BRITAIN …CONNECTICUT VIRTUOSI CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $26,500 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT …CONNECTICUT CHORAL ARTISTS INC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT …LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC: $20,000 · EducationMOORELAND HILL SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $25,000 · EnvironmentCONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsFriendship Service Center Inc: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$789,460Human Services$131,282Arts & Culture$125,500Education$30,000Environment$25,000Recreation & Sports$15,000Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AFFILIATES INC: $88,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC: $72,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNEW BRITAIN INSTITUTE: $42,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC: $42,500 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT: $40,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT VIRTUOSI CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $26,500 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetNeighborhood Promise Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetFUTURES INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHORAL ARTISTS INC: $24,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetNEW BRITAIN SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $18,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetFriendship Service Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADELBROOK INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMOORELAND HILL SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC: $7,560 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNEW OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE146 INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Main Street Singers Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AFFILIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRITAIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT VIRTUOSI CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Promise Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds FUTURES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHORAL ARTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRITAIN SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Service Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADELBROOK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOORELAND HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Savings Foun…Community Foundation …Ion Bank Foundation I…Farmington Bank Commu…The Community Chest o…Hartford Foundation f…The Maximilian E and …Aetna Foundation IncThomaston Savings Ban…The Connecticut Commu…United Way Inc United…Sloper William T
American Savings Foundation IncCT42.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Savings Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater New Britain · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Community Chest of New Britain and Berlin Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Sloper William T

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marjorie Moore Charitable Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marjorie Moore Charitable Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 43%
  • Community Mental Health Affiliates Inc: 96% of income from government
  • Friendship Service Center Inc: 85% of income from government
  • New Opportunities Inc: 70% of income from government
  • LOVE146 Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Children in Placement Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Children's Law Center Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Futures Incorporated: 43% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Covenant to Care for Children Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Prudence Crandall Center Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Connecticut Forest & Park Association: 16% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Connecticut: 14% of income from government
  • Adelbrook Inc: 9% of income from government
  • New Britain Museum of American Art Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marjorie Moore Charitable Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home