· Private foundation
Marjorie Moore Charitable Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $119k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH | $15,000 |
| PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER FOR WOMEN INC | $15,000 |
| CONNECTICUT FOREST AND PARK ASSN | $15,000 |
| KLINGBERG FAMILY CENTERS INC | $15,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP SERVICE CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,375 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SW NEW ENGLAND | $12,000 |
| CHILDREN IN PLACEMENT | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF HTFD | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA | $6,625 |
| CONNECTICUT VIRTUOSI CHAMBER ORCHESTRA | $6,000 |
| ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT | $5,000 |
| CONNECTICUT CHORAL ARTISTS INC | $5,000 |
| ADELBROOK | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCOMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AFFILIATES INC7× · 2019–2025 · $78k · revenue +4%
- PCPRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +30%
- CICHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC6× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- NPNeighborhood Promise Incone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -46%
- BVBERLIN VISITING NURSE ASSNone grant, 2023 · $25k
- BPBERLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2022 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Child Advocates of Connecticut (CAC) transforms the lives of vulnerable children and youth by providing trained and supervised one-on-one volunteer advocates in the community, classroom and courtroom.
We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.
The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.
The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…
Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements
Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.
The mission of the connecticut association for community action is to strengthen the capacities of its members to empower people in need and improve the communities in which they live.
Non-profit organization which was founded by the state of ct general assembly as a model for employer - sponsored childcare programs.
The connecticut project, a 501c3 organization, brings together people, ideas, and resources to build opportunity.
The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…
Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.
All activities conducted by the association are to enable it to:a. establish a better understanding between the members and companies in the construction and related industries.b. foster reasonable and just regulations by governments c.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children in Placement Inc and the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Promise Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AFFILIATES INC ↗
- Who funds PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN IN PLACEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS FOR LEARNING CONNECTICUT ↗
- Who funds NEW BRITAIN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Promise Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT CHORAL ARTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT VIRTUOSI CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CENTRAL CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds Friendship Service Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOREST & PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ADELBROOK INC ↗
- Who funds MOORELAND HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FUTURES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds NEW BRITAIN SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW BRITAIN INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Savings Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater New Britain · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Community Chest of New Britain and Berlin Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Sloper William T
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marjorie Moore Charitable Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Mental Health Affiliates Inc — 96% of income from government
- Friendship Service Center Inc — 85% of income from government
- New Opportunities Inc — 70% of income from government
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- Children in Placement Inc — 47% of income from government
- Children's Law Center Inc — 46% of income from government
- Futures Incorporated — 43% of income from government
- Special Olympics Connecticut Inc — 42% of income from government
- Covenant to Care for Children Inc — 35% of income from government
- Prudence Crandall Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- Connecticut Forest & Park Association — 16% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Connecticut — 14% of income from government
- Adelbrook Inc — 9% of income from government
- New Britain Museum of American Art Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.