Skip to content
Maritz Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Maritz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$12MHuman Services$1.9MHealth$952kInternational$733kPhilanthropy$384kRecreation & Sports$218kEnvironment$180kReligion$135kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $195k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $548k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$600,000
ERIKSON INSTITUTE$378,615
UNITED WORLD COLLEGE - USA$333,333
OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES$168,978
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$157,500
PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT$86,596
GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA$75,000
THE NEW ISRAEL FUND$60,000
J STREET EDUCATION FUND$30,000
MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND$25,000
PANORAMA GLOBAL$25,000
SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA$20,000
BRIGHTSPARK EARLY LEARNING SERVICES$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY$20,000
CHARTER FOR COMPASSION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ZERO TO THREE: $176k → 14%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $70k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $150k → 14%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $70k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $150k → 14%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $60k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $135k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $50k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $135k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $50k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $94k → 14%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $25k → 10%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $20k → 10%SPACE BETWEEN: $1k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $169k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $160k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $150k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $75k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $50k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $25k → 9%OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $15k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $3k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $1k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $87k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $71k → 9%PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $20k → 9%BRIGHTSPARK EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $20k → 9%BRIGHTSPARK EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 9%SPACE BETWEEN: $1k → 9%CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
NM
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 31 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
29

Total granted

$16M
$973k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

77%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.0M · revenue +46%
  • ZT
    ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES
    6× · 2017–2023 · $840k · revenue +4%
  • SC
    Seattle Children's Foundation
    4× · 2017–2021 · $684k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • AP
    AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $218k · revenue +6%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $172k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESILIENCE LAB FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $160k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
2
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
Perigee Fund

Our mission is to shift policies and systems to increasingly value and embed supports for caregiver and infant mental health in the places where families are during pregnancy and early childhood. perigee is organized & operated as a…

Health
5
Pathwaves Washington

Pathwaves Washington builds the collective power of leaders of color to transform early childhood systems so that every child and their community thrives.

Education
6
Washington Progress Fund

Washington Progress Fund is building a permanent and powerful social change movement in Washington state supported by a network of committed donors. WPF envisions a Washington state where government serves the public interest and we all…

Philanthropy
7
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
8
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
9
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
10
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
11
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
12
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation

The Pro-Choice Washington Foundation is our 501c3 focused on issue research, leadership development, and community and decision-maker education.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peace First Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Givat Haviva. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
28/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $9,046,050 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER: $1,041,666 · EducationTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMERErikson Institute: $728,097 · EducationErikson Institute+5 more: $67,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $1,203,213 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHIN…Seattle Children's Foundation: $683,865 · OtherSeattle Children's F…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $172,140 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL …UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESILIENCE LAB FUND: $160,000 · OtherSTROUM JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $126,562 · Other+30 more: $732,000 · Other+30 moreZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $839,892 · Human ServicesZERO TO THREE…OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $619,243 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS PER…CHARTER FOR COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $345,000 · Human ServicesCHARTER FOR C…PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $177,321 · Human ServicesPROGRAM FOR E…+4 more: $71,500 · Human ServicesNEW ISRAEL FUND: $215,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $70,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $45,000 · InternationalTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $30,000 · InternationalVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $30,000 · InternationalPANORAMA GLOBAL: $25,000 · International+5 more: $42,500 · InternationalSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $244,223 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $65,000 · PhilanthropyAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $218,200 · Recreation & SportsJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $95,000 · Religion
Education$10,883,313Other$3,077,780Human Services$2,052,956International$457,500Philanthropy$309,223Recreation & Sports$218,200Religion$95,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $9,046,050 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER: $1,041,666 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $839,892 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetErikson Institute: $728,097 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $683,865 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $619,243 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetCHARTER FOR COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL: $345,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $244,223 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $218,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $215,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT: $177,321 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHUMMINGBIRD INDIGENOUS FAMILY SERVICES: $90,100 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $77,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM PROJECT: $75,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM: $70,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBrightspark Early Learning Services: $51,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $45,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON: $35,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSoutheast Seattle Education Coalition: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED EARTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPERINATAL SUPPORT WASHINGTON: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlliance for Education: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetT'RUAH: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIDDLE EAST PEACE DIALOGUE NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $8,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetProgress House Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEACE FIRST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR COURAGE & RENEWAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCenter For Justice And Human Dignity: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BRIGHTON JONES RICHER LIFE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL NETWORK DBA CHILD CARE AWARE WA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPACE BETWEEN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JOSH FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationGates FoundationUnited Way of King Co…Perigee FundAnthony-Maymudes Fami…Stolte Family Foundat…Ridge Road FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…The Satterberg Founda…The Norcliffe Foundat…Medina FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…
Seattle FoundationWA36.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gates Foundation · United Way of King County · Perigee Fund · Anthony-Maymudes Family Foundation · Stolte Family Foundation · Ridge Road Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Medina Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maritz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maritz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Maritz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Maritz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maritz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home