· Private foundation
Marisa Martini Private Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $711k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE | $100,000 |
| BRAILLE INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| ST PETERS PREP | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF GUATEMALAN CHILDREN INC | $50,000 |
| EMPOWER ETHIOPIA INC | $50,000 |
| PARTNERSHPS FOR CHILDREN | $41,000 |
| MERCY CENTER | $35,000 |
| THE LITTLE BABY FACE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| THURMAN BRISBANE CENTER | $25,000 |
| UHMLA | $25,000 |
| ELIZABETH COALITION | $25,000 |
| NAZARETH FARMS | $25,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBINIMIA FDN | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| ANCHOR RIDGE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $391k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $466k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF GUATEMALAN CHILDREN INC5× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +59%
- HHHawassa Hope Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $203k · revenue +12%
- BIBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +122%
Funded once
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +78%- MCMercy Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +34%
- BHBABIES HEART FUNDone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.
Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they concentrate on what is most important - fighting for their child's life.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
Our mission is to enable and finance the development of life-saving genetic medicines for ultra-rare patient populations previously deemed too rare to treat. to realize this, our unique ecosystems facilitates collaboration between…
The mission of CureNFwithJack is to accelerate awareness and find a cure or effective treatment through the funding of research. CureNFwithJack provides seed money for innovate research in multiple areas, including but not limited to drug…
The organization is a partnership of world leaders in als research and care focused on expediting breakthrough treatments and ultimately a cure for als while providing resources and equipment to those living with the disease now. the team…
Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.
Leading the fight to treat and cure als through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with lou gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.
Cures Within Reach leverages the speed, safety and cost-effectiveness of testing approved therapies for new indications/diseases without effective treatment driving more treatments quicker to more patients.
The prayers from maria foundation was established to fight a specific form of childhood brain cancer commonly referred to as "gliomas." the foundation's purpose is to find a cure for this tragic family of diseases, while also providing…
Our mission is to drive research for treatments and a cure for sma, and to support and empower everyone impacted by sma today.
To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Center Corporation and the most unlike its peers is The Wishing Chair Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GUATEMALAN CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Hawassa Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Empower Ethiopia Inc ↗
- Who funds UHMLA INC ↗
- Who funds NAZARETH FARM INC ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATED CURE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANCHOR RIDGE ↗
- Who funds LEASHES OF VALOR ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES OF THE WOUNDED FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NOURISHNJ INC ↗
- Who funds WarriorNOW ↗
- Who funds ONE SIMPLE WISH INC ↗
- Who funds United Cajun Navy ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER HER NETWORK INC DBA EMPOWERED NETWORK ↗
- Who funds New Community Corporation ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION AIRDROP INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · American Express Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marisa Martini Private Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Empower Her Network Inc Dba Empowered Network — 47% of income from government
- Nourishnj Inc — 27% of income from government
- Mercy Center Corporation — 21% of income from government
- New Community Corporation — 4% of income from government
- Jespy House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.