How much did MARION AND CADELL S LIEDTKE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of MARION AND CADELL S LIEDTKE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

furthercancermidland

2020

memorygovernor'sgeorgemidland

2021

cancer

2022

—

2023

—

2024

medicalmidland

2025

dallas

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k15 grants · $33k
$10k–50k3 grants · $48k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$1.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

CAMPAIGN FOR PBBHC$25,000
FIRST TEE - WEST TEXAS$12,500
THE KINKAID SCHOOL$10,500
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$8,905
CORBETT MEDICAL FOUNDATION$5,000
YOUNG LIFE DALLAS METRO$3,000
MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$2,500
MIDLAND COUNTY LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION$2,500
MISSION AGAPE$2,500
THE PETROLEUM MUSEUM$2,000
MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST$1,500
SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF$1,000
TEXAS PARKS & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$1,000
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
NITA STEWART HALEY MEMORIAL LIBRARY$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 13%. 25% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$330k · 20 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +93% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$330k

$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%

+5%

Still filing today

45%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $65k · revenue +93%
TK
THE KINKAID SCHOOL
5× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +55%
RM
REFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC
3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +663%

Funded once

IF
INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -17%
HI
HOOVER INSTITUTION
one grant, 2019 · $10k
NP
NORTH PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Trinity School of Midland Texas

Trinity school of midland is a college preparatory community that offers an exceptionally enriched program providing children beginning in preschool and going through twelfth grade with experiences in the visual and performing arts,…

Education

Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education

Bosque School

Bosque School is a coeducational college preparatory school creating transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate…

Education

Fort Worth Museum of Science

Dedicated to lifelong learning and anchored by our rich collections, the fort worth museum of science and history engages our diverse community through creative, vibrant programs and exhibits interpreting science and the stores of texas…

Arts & Culture

Midland School Corporation

Midland school provides a distinctive co-educational boarding school (see schedule o) experience to a diverse student body in grades 9-12. through study and work, midland teaches the value of a lifetime of learning, self-reliance,…

Education

Texas Foundation for Educational

School's mission is to help establish basic skills through teaching methods that enhance a child's joy in learning, ability to learn, and interest in learning while fostering the child's self-confidence.

Education

Mission Health Care Inc

The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.

Health

Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture

The McCombs School of Business

To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.

Education

The Compass School of Texas

We believe in inquiry-based learning and bringing real-world experiences into the classroom to help students draw connections between lessons and how they can impact the world.

Education

North Texas Christian Foundation

As the North Texas affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy

Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers -

Faith based acute care hospital providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to McKinney, Texas and the surrounding communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the and the most unlike its peers is Nita Stewart Haley Memorial Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$259,194Education$103,100Human Services$18,500Arts & Culture$16,100Housing & Shelter$15,000Food & Nutrition$13,000Recreation & Sports$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger FoundationTX28.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Beal Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable · Walter & Jere Hubbard Family Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Bryant Family Foundation · The Fasken Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MARION AND CADELL S LIEDTKE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GEORGE W BUSH CHILDHOOD HOME.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~48 months of operating runway; revenue held over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 752925197 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GEORGE W BUSH CHILDHOOD HOME, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 48 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Marion and Cadell S Liedtke?

Find your warmest path to Marion and Cadell S Liedtke through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MARION AND CADELL S LIEDTKE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marion and Cadell S Liedtke?

More from the funding graph

MARION AND CADELL S LIEDTKE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marion and Cadell S Liedtke?

More from the funding graph