· Public charity
Mariners Care
The primary exempt purpose of MARINERS CARE is to support youth-oriented community service programs & other worthy projects in the pacific northwest.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $787,712 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,044,938 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $257,226 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $203k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
- $250k+1 grant · $382k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $382,354 |
| DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION | $37,000 |
| PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED | $28,000 |
| SOUNDVIEW LITTLE LEAGUE | $20,000 |
| BASEBALL BEYOND BORDERS | $17,850 |
| FRIENDS OF BASEBALL | $15,000 |
| SOUTHEAST YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES | $12,184 |
| BACKPACK BRIGADE | $11,334 |
| EL1 SPORTS | $11,192 |
| SEATTLE CENTRAL LITTLE LEAGUE | $10,000 |
| EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA | $10,000 |
| WAHLUKE HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $590k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGreater Metro Parks Foundation dba Tacoma Parks Foundation4× · 2018–2022 · $102k · revenue +95%
- BBBASEBALL BEYOND BORDERS5× · 2019–2024 · $99k · revenue +91%
- SPSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2024 · $57k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- UHUNITE HERE NORTHWEST HEALTH TRUST FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $348k · revenue +79%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONone grant, 2021 · $225k
- RARAINIER ATHLETESone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
FM Sports Baseball Club helps develop, train, and promotes players ages 13 to 18 for long term success in high school, college, and beyond.
Provide Baseball Leaugues and tournaments
adult volunteers helping on average ~300 children each year ages 4-12 in East Vancouver WA area to grow and develop by working as a team to achieve goals and have fun.
Soccer club that brings premier and select teams under one management. league play and academy training for all players.
Provide organized soccer for the youth in seattle
Northwest United is a premier youth soccer club serving Skagit County and surrounding areas. As one of the top clubs in the Pacific Northwest, we have grown to 41 teams across boys and girls' divisions, offering year-round development for…
To provide opportunities for all youths under the age of 19 develop character and play affiliated soccer at a level commensurate with their ability and interest.
Organized youth sports
To provide opportunities for all youths under the age of 19 to develop character and play affiliated soccer at a level commensurate with their ability and interest.
PacNW offers top-level soccer training and development opportunities for players aged U8 through U19, all of whom are trained using the club's deliberate, integrated, long-term plan for player development.
To foster, develop, and promote recreational girls youth softball.
An athletic program for youth that teaches and reinforces the values of teamwork, sportsmanship, citizenship and physical well being. Our organization is guided by the leadership of community orientated volunteers. We serve over 600…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Baseball and the most unlike its peers is Dragon Elite Baseball Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITE HERE NORTHWEST HEALTH TRUST FUND ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Greater Metro Parks Foundation dba Tacoma Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds Downtown Emergency Service Center ↗
- Who funds BASEBALL BEYOND BORDERS ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE 180 ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BASEBALL ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds Bandits Breer Fastpitch ↗
- Who funds You Grow Girl ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds RAINIER ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds YOUR MONEY MATTERS ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Pro Baseball Club ↗
- Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
- Who funds Kent Little League ↗
- Who funds Hunger Intervention Program ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FEDERAL WAY NATIONAL LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Seattle Fastpitch Club ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON LADYHAWKS FASTPITCH ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Greater Seattle Business Assn Scholarship Fund ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds BACKPACK BRIGADE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · School's Out Washington · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Medina Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Aven Foundation · Fales Foundation Trust · Building Changes
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mariners Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Miguel Cabrera Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mariners Care?
Find your warmest path to Mariners Care through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.