Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marilyn W Dugan Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2023
46
Grants FY2023
19
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$60kHuman Services$4kHealth$3kHousing & Shelter$2kInternational$2kEducation$760Public Safety & Disaster$450Animals$250Other$0
02FY2023 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
19
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT$6,000
OUR LADY OF FATIMA$4,359
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,300
BISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL BRIDGEPORT CT$2,300
Individual grant recipient$2,000
THE VINCENTIAN CONGREGATION$2,000
FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY$1,020
LOVERS OF HOLY CROSS OF GOVAP$1,000
SISTER SERVANTS OF MOST SACRED HEART OF JESUS$1,000
COVENANT HOUSE$900
SALVATION ARMY$800
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY$600
ASSOCIATION OF THE MIRACULOUS MEDAL$500
FRANSCISCAN FRIARS OF MARY IMMACULATE$400
MISSIONARY OBLATES OF MARY IMMACULATE$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $50 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $20 → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $900 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $600 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $200 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $150 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $150 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $150 → 17%AMERICAN REDCROSS: $200 → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $1k → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $20 → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $20 → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $20 → 9%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S AGENCY: $20 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
SD
OH
PA
CT
NE
VA
MD
NM
AR
TN
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$63k · 37 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
14

Total granted

$63k
$870

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+43%

Still filing today

30%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2018–2023 · $2k · revenue +125%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +34%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • MC
    MACEDONIA CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2019 · $50 · revenue -8%
  • SH
    SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50 · revenue +84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Sunset Park Health Council Inc

The mission of the family health centers at nyu langone is to improve the overall health of the communities it serves by delivering high quality, culturally-competent primary car, and related services within community-based settings.

Health
11
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF FATIMA: $24,717 · OtherOUR LADY OF FATIMABISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL BRIDGEPORT CT: $15,800 · OtherBISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL BRIDGEPORT CTDIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT: $6,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORTIndividual grant recipient: $4,110 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+49 more: $13,799 · Other+49 moreCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,150 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $1,100 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 · Human Services+3 more: $260 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,325 · Health+2 more: $75 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,025 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $510 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $310 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $200 · International+1 more: $50 · InternationalNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $250 · AnimalsWOODCOCK NATURE CENTER INC: $200 · EnvironmentSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $50 · Education
Other$64,426Human Services$3,710Health$2,400International$2,095Animals$250Environment$200Education$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC: $1,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,025 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $510 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $310 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODCOCK NATURE CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $115 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOARING EAGLE: $90 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $70 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds WOODCOCK NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

B & R Charitable Foundation IncTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · Alexander and Linda Milley Foundation · The Salem Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marilyn W Dugan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marilyn W Dugan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Family & Children's Agency Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marilyn W Dugan Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Marilyn W Dugan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marilyn W Dugan’s filings →

More from the funding graph