Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marie Leist Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$140kEducation$114kCommunity Improvement$48kHousing & Shelter$38kArts & Culture$29kEmployment$28kYouth Development$19kHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$875k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ronceverte Development Corporation$18,000
Individual grant recipient$9,980
Davis Elkins College$6,000
New River Community Tech College$4,000
Gateway Industries$3,500
Ronceverte Lions Club$3,010
Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids$2,500
Ronceverte Public Library$1,600
Shepherds Ctr of Greenbrier Valley$1,500
Greenbrier Valley Aquatic Center$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Communities in School Gbr County$1,000
Greenbrier Valley Comm Foundation$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 21%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $3k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $3k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $3k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $2k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $2k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $2k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $2k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $2k → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $1k → 18%Alderson Ministerial Association: $2k → 18%West Virginia Healing Home: $1k → 18%Shepherds Ctr of Greenbrier Valley: $3k → 18%Family Refuge Center: $2k → 18%Family Refuge Center: $2k → 18%Family Refuge Center: $2k → 18%Shepherds Ctr of Greenbrier Valley: $2k → 18%Family Refuge Center: $2k → 18%Family Refuge Center: $2k → 18%Family Refuge Center: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$434k · 19 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
11

Total granted

$434k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+0%

Still filing today

53%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    Ronceverte Development Corporation
    5× · 2019–2025 · $48k · revenue +71%
  • CH
    CARNEGIE HALL INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +58%
  • FR
    FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $10k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • NR
    New River Comm Tech College
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • DI
    DAVIS-STUART INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -40%
  • RD
    RONCEVERTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION-MAIN STREET
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenbrier County Committee On Aging Inc

The organization operates a senior citizen's center in greenbrier county west virgnia. senior citizens are provided with transportation, nutrition, in-home care and other personal and social services.

Human Services
2
Greenbrier Valley Restoration Project Inc

Gvrp, inc. is an entity focused on watershed protection and sustainable community development. gvrp is concentrating its initial efforts in two areas: public fundraising and development of a community center and charitable open space in…

Environment
3
Greater Greenbrier Long-Term Recovery Committee

To ensure the safety and wellbeing of Greenbrier Valley citizens in all phases of disaster.

—
4
Greenville Revitalization Corp

To act as the economic development arm of the gcra by bringing economic opportunity to disadvantaged areas of greenville county.

—
5
The Greater Greenbrier Valley
Philanthropy
6
The Homeplace of Green River Inc

To protect and promote rural american culture, local history and sustainability of agriculture and natural resources through education, conservation and the economic opportunities of tourism.

Community Improvement
7
Green Acres Regional Center Inc

Provide skill development to assist intellectually disabled adults

Human Services
8
Greater Greenville Housing & Revitalizat

Develop, provide, and promote safe, affordable, and decent housing and design, research, and/or promote revitalization activities and facilitate the coordination of various service and support activities for the greater Greenville…

Community Improvement
9
United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc

Our mission: to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the communities in pocahontas, greenbrier, and monroe counties, west virginia. the mission includes providing a conduit for the public to support specific organizations and,…

Human Services
10
Reynolds County Day Center

Provide quality daycare for adults and children to improve participants well-being, community health, and workforce development.

Education
11
Greenbrier Community School Inc

Our school community is a place of collaboration, trust, and civility. We are a community of learners with classes from 18 months to 5th grade.

Education
12
Greenbank Mill Associates Inc

Our mission is dedicated to preserving the greenbank mill national historical district as a public museum and expanding public knowledge of red clay vally industrial, agricultural and social hstory through on site educational and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenbrier Historical Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alderson Ministerial Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $145,419 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDavis Elkins College: $53,000 · OtherDavis Elkins CollegeRonceverte Development Corporation: $47,500 · OtherRonceverte Development CorporationNEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 · OtherNEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCRonceverte Public Library: $17,950 · OtherRonceverte Lions Club: $17,435 · OtherWhite Pine Holiness Camp: $14,000 · Other+15 more: $42,575 · Other+15 moreNORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS: $18,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY: $4,000 · Human ServicesALDERSON MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC: $27,500 · EmploymentCommunities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentRONCEVERTE RIVER FESTIVAL INC: $6,000 · Community ImprovementGREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,500 · Arts & CultureDAVIS-STUART INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$370,879Human Services$34,500Employment$27,500Youth Development$6,000Community Improvement$6,000Arts & Culture$3,500Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRonceverte Development Corporation: $47,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $33,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetGATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC: $27,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS: $18,000 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetCARNEGIE HALL INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY: $4,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDAVIS-STUART INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALDERSON MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWest Virginia Healing Home Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ronceverte Development Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Communities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc ↗
  • Who funds RONCEVERTE RIVER FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS CENTER OF THE GREENBRIER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS-STUART INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENBRIER VALLEY AQUATIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALDERSON MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds West Virginia Healing Home Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hollowell Dawkins Foundation IncWV30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hollowell Dawkins Foundation Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Seneca Trail Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc · The Jeanne G Hamilton and Lawson W Hamilton Jr Family Foundation Inc · The Daywood Foundationinc · Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Abner & Mildred Levine Family Foundation Inc · Pyles & Turner Foundation Inc · Tgkvf Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marie Leist Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marie Leist Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marie Leist Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Marie Leist Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marie Leist’s filings →

    More from the funding graph