Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mariani Nut Company Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
74
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$240kHealth$126kFood & Nutrition$117kRecreation & Sports$76kCommunity Improvement$39kYouth Development$25kEnvironment$24kHuman Services$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k72 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHY FAMILY PROJECT INC$10,000
CONSERVATIVE PARTNERSHIP INSTITUTE$10,000
AG WEST FARM CREDIT$7,988
FRIENDS OF WINTERS FFA$7,500
FATEH SPORTS CLUB$5,000
YOLO CRISIS NURSERY$5,000
YOLO COUNTY FOOD BANK$4,000
SEAN M WALSK K-9 MEMORIAL FOUNDATIO$2,500
WINTERS HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
WINTERS COMMUNITY CORAZON$2,500
WINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$2,500
YOLO LAND TRUST$2,500
ST ANTHONY PARISH$2,000
WINTERS SENIOR FOUNDATION$2,000
YOLO HOSPICE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $5k → 16%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $5k → 16%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $5k → 16%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
UT
VA
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$571k · 111 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

111 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 71 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

111
125

Total granted

$571k
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+10%

Still filing today

12%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +60%
  • WL
    WINTERS LITTLE LEAGUE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +107%
  • YL
    YOLO LAND TRUST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • NH
    NEW HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue +7%
  • CS
    COSTCO SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yolo Food Bank

The mission of yolo food bank is to make yolo county a thriving community where everyone has the resources they need to experience health, prosperity, and a high quality of life. Yolo Food bank durably increases food and nutrition security…

Food & Nutrition
2
California Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom

To increase awareness and understanding of agriculture among california educators and students.

—
3
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
4
Yolo County Library Foundation

To enhance the ability of the Yolo County Library to provide library services to its widespread and diverse population by supporting reading programs and its 7 branch libraries. Our current funding priorities are 1)early literacy so…

Education
5
Yolo County Childrens Alliance

Work together to improve the lives of children, youth, and families in our communities.the childrens alliance is an inter-agency collaborative, which coordinates needed family support services,convenes child and family advocates to solve…

Crime & Legal
6
Alliance of Californias Farmers and Ranchers Community Fund

To engage in and support public education and research to protect and enhance Californias agricultural infrastructure and natural resources.

Food & Nutrition
7
Sacramento County Ag Foundation

To educate the youth in Sacramento County about the importance of hands-on agriculture.

Education
8
Bear Yuba Land Trust

Bear Yuba Land Trust exists to conserve and protect the natural, working, and cultural lands in the Bear and Yuba River watersheds and empower a healthy, resilient community through nature access and education.

Environment
9
Yolo Healthy Aging Alliance

To promote the well being of older adults in Yolo County through education, collaboration and advocacy.

Human Services
10
Foodlink for Tulare County Inc

FoodLink is committed to ending hunger by providing healthy food and nutrition education to those in need through community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
11
Cencal Youth Sports

To promote hard work, integrity, and trust to the youth of central california through our sports and fitness programs.

Education
12
Tree Fresno

To provide education and assistance to the general public on the planting and preservation of trees in the urban environment and the creating of trails and green belts.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Clara Police Activities League Inc; the most unlike its peers is University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 271 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/42
Grantees still filing
25/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FARM CREDIT WEST: $36,399 · OtherFARM CREDIT WESTPROJECT PLAYGROUND: $30,000 · OtherWINTERS LITTLE LEAGUE: $24,685 · OtherCITY OF HOPE: $22,600 · Other+180 more: $479,137 · Other+180 moreWINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $102,500 · HealthWINTERS HEALTHC…+3 more: $2,250 · HealthFOOD LITERACY CENTER: $12,500 · Food & NutritionWINTERS FARM TO SCHOOL: $4,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $2,000 · Food & NutritionHONEYBEE DISCOVERY CENTER: $1,500 · Food & NutritionCALIFORNIA HONEY FESTIVAL: $1,000 · Food & NutritionYOLO LAND TRUST: $19,500 · EnvironmentCenter for Land-Based Learning: $1,000 · EnvironmentYolo Crisis Nursery: $16,000 · Human ServicesStater Bros Charities: $1,500 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterConservative Partnership Institute: $10,000 · EducationCAL POLY CORPORATION: $1,000 · Education
Other$592,821Health$104,750Food & Nutrition$21,000Environment$20,500Human Services$17,500Housing & Shelter$11,000Education$11,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $102,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWINTERS LITTLE LEAGUE: $24,685 over 8y, 19% of budgetYOLO LAND TRUST: $19,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD LITERACY CENTER: $12,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNEW HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $11,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWINTERS PARENT NURSERY SCHOOL: $8,550 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetYOLO COUNTY FARM BUREAU: $8,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetYOLO HOSPICE INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Clara Police Activities League Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWINTERS FARM TO SCHOOL: $4,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetVIRGINIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS: $2,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFAMILY WATER ALLIANCE: $2,350 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREACHING HIGHER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStater Bros Charities: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONEYBEE DISCOVERY CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GOLDEN EMPIRE COUNCIL: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWinters Friends of the Library: $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetADMIRALS BASEBALL ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINGS COUNTY FARM BUREAU INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetACME THEATRE COMPANY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA HONEY FESTIVAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDAVIS DIAMONDS PARENTS CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESILIENCY CENTER OF FRESNO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINTERS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WINTERS LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds YOLO LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
  • Who funds WINTERS PARENT NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YOLO COUNTY FARM BUREAU ↗
  • Who funds YOLO HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Winters Senior Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Santa Clara Police Activities League Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINTERS FARM TO SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA28.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Robert & Margaret McNamara Foundation · Yolo Community Foundation · Clark Pacific Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Kelly Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mariani Nut Company Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mariani Nut Company Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 271 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mariani Nut Company’s filings →

    More from the funding graph