Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marian Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$184kReligion$137kEducation$47kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kEnvironment$19kHealth$16kFood & Nutrition$13kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
22
States reached
$744k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SALESIAN SISTERS OF ST JOHN BOSCO$7,800
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$6,000
MEE JOO CATHOLIC INC$4,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$3,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$3,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$3,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$3,000
WORLD VISION$3,000
UNICEF$3,000
UNBOUND$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CHURCH OF MADONNA$2,200
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNBOUND: $5k → 16%UNBOUND: $3k → 16%UNBOUND: $3k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
DC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$418k · 65 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

65 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
38

Total granted

$418k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+20%

Still filing today

31%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +98%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +76%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • C
    COICE
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • AA
    ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +105%
  • WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
3
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
4
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
9
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
10
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterorg; the most unlike its peers is Asociacion Mirine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALESIAN SISTERS OF SAINT JOHN BOSCO: $49,900 · OtherSALESIAN SISTERS OF SAINT JOHN BOSCOCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $28,500 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESSALESIAN SISTERS OF ST JOHN BOSCO: $14,600 · OtherSALESIAN SISTERS OF ST JOHN BOSCOIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherMEE JOO CATHOLIC INC: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+84 more: $123,300 · Other+84 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $43,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCWORLD VISION INC: $35,200 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $33,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFInternational Rescue Committee INC: $18,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $18,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $8,000 · International+8 more: $14,652 · International+8 moreSOGANG ALUMNI AMERICA: $40,000 · EducationSOGANG AL…Unbound: $14,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,300 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $800 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · HealthWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 · EnvironmentFeeding America: $2,200 · Food & Nutrition
Other$248,800International$170,352Education$40,000Human Services$16,500Health$13,600Environment$11,500Food & Nutrition$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $43,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOGANG ALUMNI AMERICA: $40,000 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $35,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $33,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $18,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASOCIACION MIRINE: $3,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUDAN RELIEF FUND INC: $2,152 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMA Animal Rescue Incorporated: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOGANG ALUMNI AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ASOCIACION MIRINE ↗
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The A&S Giancristofaro Family Foundation IncNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The A&S Giancristofaro Family Foundation Inc · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · The Salem Foundation · Mutual of America Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · John & Barbara Friedrich Foundation · James J Capone Charitable Foundati · Alexander and Linda Milley Foundation · Clare and Robert Gray Charitable Foundation Inc · B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marian Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marian Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Goodwill Industries International Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marian Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Marian Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marian Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph