Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margaret Irene Taylor Nelson & Mary Nelson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$550kReligion$368kInternational$136kHuman Services$136k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$50,000
WIND RIVER MINISTRIES$50,000
PRESTONWOOD PREGNANCY CENTER$50,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$50,000
FAVOR INTERNATIONAL$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 9%JONI & FRIENDS: $24k → 14%PRESTONWOOD PREGNANCY CENTER: $50k → 14%DANITA'S CHILDREN: $21k → 13%FAVOR INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 13%THRIVE ST LOUIS: $100k → 21%ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES: $30k → 10%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $24k → 21%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $24k → 9%WIND RIVER MINISTRIES: $50k → 11%PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $50k → 4%GATEWAY CTR FOR WORLD MISSION: $5k → 15%JONI & FRIENDS: $12k → 14%THRIVE ST LOUIS: $100k → 21%ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES: $30k → 10%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12k → 21%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $18k → 9%PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $24k → 4%THRIVE ST LOUIS: $100k → 21%ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES: $30k → 10%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $14k → 9%PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $14k → 4%THRIVE ST LOUIS: $100k → 21%ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES: $30k → 10%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $13k → 9%PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $12k → 4%THRIVE ST LOUIS: $100k → 21%ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES: $30k → 10%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $13k → 9%PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $7k → 4%ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES: $15k → 10%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $13k → 9%PRISON FELLOWSHIP: $7k → 4%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $12k → 9%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$964k · 6 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -64% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$964k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-64%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THRIVE ST LOUIS INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $500k · revenue -50%
  • AR
    ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $165k · revenue -72% · 45% of their budget
  • FO
    FOCUS ON THE FAMILY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $115k

Funded once

  • DC
    DANITA'S CHILDREN
    one grant, 2017 · $21k
  • TG
    The Gateway Center for World Mission
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bowlin Ministries Nc

Evangelist

Religion
2
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
3
Servant of God Ministries Inc

Missionary support ministry to pastors and missionaries in Africa and India. We encouraging and uplifting them with spiritual and devotional teachings of Jesus using the internet. Partners in winning souls for the Kingdom of God.

Religion
4
Gospel Joy International

Gospel Joy's Mission is to passionately proclaim the cross-centered, Christ-treasuring Gospel and to make disciples who live for the glory of God by striving to maximize their joy and the joy of others in Him. Its vision is to contribute…

International
5
The Word for All Nations

To see Christian churches in many countries and train leaders in all aspects of biblical ministry as contained in the Christian scriptures, and to carry this message equally to prisons and prinsoners.

—
6
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
7
Scott Nute Global Ministries

Christian evangelism

Religion
8
Wheresoever Ministries Inc

Christian Evangelism, Church Planting, Equipping and Encouraging Christian Believers, Prayer, Benevolence.

Education
9
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
10
Jessica Yoon Ministries

Spread the Christianity

Religion
11
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
12
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Favor International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THRIVE ST LOUIS INC: $500,000 · HealthTHRIVE ST LOUIS INCADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC: $164,500 · OtherADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES INCFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $114,702 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYPRISON FELLOWSHIP: $113,146 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIPPRESTONWOOD CARING PEOPLE NETWORK: $50,000 · OtherPRESTONWOOD CARING PEOPLE NETWORKJONI AND FRIENDS: $35,850 · OtherJONI AND FRIENDSDANITA'S CHILDREN: $20,800 · OtherFavor International Inc: $50,000 · InternationalFavor Int…HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $50,000 · InternationalHOPE INTE…WIND RIVER MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,850 · ReligionThe Gateway Center for World Mission: $5,000 · Religion
Health$500,000Other$498,998International$100,000Religion$90,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHRIVE ST LOUIS INC: $500,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC: $164,500 over 6y, 45% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $35,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $35,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gateway Center for World Mission: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THRIVE ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCING RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Favor International Inc ↗
  • Who funds WIND RIVER MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds The Gateway Center for World Mission ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margaret Irene Taylor Nelson & Mary Nelson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret Irene Taylor Nelson & Mary Nelson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Margaret Irene Taylor Nelson & Mary Nelson Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Margaret Irene Taylor Nelson & Mary Nelson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margaret Irene Taylor Nelson & Mary Nelson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph