Skip to content
Margaret and Foster Madeley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Margaret and Foster Madeley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$129kHousing & Shelter$115kHuman Services$75kHealth$36kCommunity Improvement$24kMembership Benefit$20kEducation$6kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF SORROWS COMMUNITY HOMES$50,000
CONROE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$20,000
ANGEL REACH$5,000
COMPASSION UNITED$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES: $6k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $5k → 14%ANGEL REACH: $13k → 9%CONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES: $6k → 14%COMPASSION UNITED: $12k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $11k → 9%CONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES: $4k → 14%COMPASSION UNITED: $11k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $8k → 9%COMPASSION UNITED: $5k → 9%ANGEL REACH: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
TN
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 41% of Margaret and Foster Madeley Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 41% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 27%.

Margaret and Foster Madeley Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$333k · 7 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$333k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+17%

Still filing today

43%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $101k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF SORROWS COMMUNITY HOMES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $99k
  • AR
    ANGEL REACH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • LA
    LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -3%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
2
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
3
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
4
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
5
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
6
Crosspoint Inc

Crosspoint exists to build safer and stronger communities by empowering individuals to lead productive lives.

Health
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Via Rehabilitation Services Inc

Our mission is to empower people with disabilities and their families to grow, develop, and thrive by providing essential skill-building, therapeutic, and recreational programs.

Health
9
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
10
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

—
11
Partnership Housing Inc

Partnership housing, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
12
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Connecting Point of Park Cities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF SORROWS: $101,090 · OtherSISTERS OF OUR LADY OF SORROWSOUR LADY OF SORROWS COMMUNITY HOMES: $99,089 · OtherOUR LADY OF SORROWS COMMUNITY HOMESSACRED HEART PARISH CONROE: $28,000 · OtherSACRED HEART PARISH CONROEMONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION MADELEY FAMILY FUND: $24,000 · OtherMONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION MADELEY FAMILY FUNDLEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION SOCIETYCONROE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · OtherCONROE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION+3 more: $12,500 · OtherANGEL REACH: $37,000 · Human ServicesANGEL REACHCompassion United: $28,000 · Human ServicesCompassion UnitedCONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES: $15,500 · Human ServicesCONNECTING POINT OF PARK…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT …INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $3,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationYoung Texas Artists Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBENEVOLENT MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 · International
Other$304,679Human Services$88,500Housing & Shelter$8,000Education$6,000Arts & Culture$3,000International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANGEL REACH: $37,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCompassion United: $28,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCONNECTING POINT OF PARK CITIES: $15,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Texas Artists Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPROJECT RETURN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENEVOLENT MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH11.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margaret and Foster Madeley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret and Foster Madeley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Margaret and Foster Madeley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home