· Private foundation
Margaret a Cargill Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k57 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $650k
- $50k–250k47 grants · $6.9M
- $250k+170 grants · $139M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION | $3,662,000 |
| SAINT PAUL AND MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $3,550,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES | $3,405,000 |
| FIRST PEOPLES FUND | $2,575,000 |
| MID ATLANTIC ARTS | $2,400,000 |
| OXFAM-AMERICA INC | $2,382,000 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA | $2,065,000 |
| NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $2,000,000 |
| MALIASILI INITIATIVES INC | $2,000,000 |
| MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC | $2,000,000 |
| LUTHERAN SERVICES IN AMERICA INCORPORATED | $2,000,000 |
| WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $1,991,500 |
| CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION | $1,927,000 |
| LEADINGAGE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $1,800,000 |
| COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC - CARE | $1,750,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $36.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 14% of Margaret a Cargill Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.
528 repeat relationships: 177 still active in FY2024, 351 since wound down; 70 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $43M · revenue +62%- CFCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $32M · revenue +250%
OXFAM-AMERICA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $24M · revenue +8%
Funded once
- UUUpstream USA Incone grant, 2018 · $2.5M · revenue -5%
- ITINTERACTION THE AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR VOLUNTARY INT'L ACTION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2.0M · revenue +55% · 32% of their budget
- CKC K BLANDIN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue +6%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
How this is measured
821 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 821 of the 1,062 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN AMERICA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEADINGAGE MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds The End Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVING THE DREAM INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds THE FUNDERS NETWORK INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · The K Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Target Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Minnesota Community Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Mortenson Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Margaret a Cargill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret a Cargill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Management Sciences for Health Inc: 67% of income from government
- Mid Atlantic Arts Inc: 66% of income from government
- Jhpiego Corporation: 65% of income from government
- Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
- Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
- Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
- Achieving the Dream Inc: 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
- Anthropocene Alliance: 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Margaret a Cargill Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Margaret a Cargill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Margaret a Cargill’s filings →