Skip to content
Mansfield Cares Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mansfield Cares Inc

Mansfield cares, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, is the philanthropic arm of mansfield energy that actively supports a broad range of charitable organizations across north america.

$640k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$377k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$2.0MYouth Development$142kPublic Safety & Disaster$107kPhilanthropy$97kRecreation & Sports$32kEducation$30kReligion$25kEnvironment$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $579,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $640,417 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,517 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $176k
  • $250k+1 grant · $377k
$12,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$919k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Muscular Dystrophy Association$376,980
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HALL CO$30,000
PGA CHAMPIONSHIP TOUR$26,136
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN BAPTIST CHURCH$25,000
HOLY FAMILY CRISTO REY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC$12,500
MUSKET CORPORATION$12,500
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL$10,000
INSPIREDU INC$10,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC$10,000
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION$7,500
Exxon Mobil$7,284
Valero Energy Foundation Valero Texas Open$6,000
SPECIAL CAMPS FOR SPECIAL KIDS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $13k → 11%CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $6k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $51k → 6%SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND: $10k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 11 repeat orgs$515k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$2.0M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-13%

Still filing today

82%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $462k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LANIER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +190%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2018–2024 · $82k · revenue +9%
  • VE
    VALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $66k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CRISTO REY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -10%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -46%
  • JB
    JARRARD BURCH FOUNDATIONINC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
4
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
5
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
6
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
7
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose Inc

Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…

Philanthropy
9
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
10
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
11
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
12
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jarrard Burch Foundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,482,092 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INCCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $179,879 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INCMuscular Dystrophy Association: $376,980 · OtherMuscular Dystrophy Ass…PGA TOUR INC: $26,136 · OtherTRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherCITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION: $22,666 · OtherMUSKET CORPORATION: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $38,485 · Other+4 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $82,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $6,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LANIER INC: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentVALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION: $66,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $14,568 · PhilanthropyJARRARD BURCH FOUNDATIONINC: $8,915 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyINSPIREDU INC: $20,000 · EducationCRISTO REY BIRMINGHAM WORK STUDY: $15,000 · EducationNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL: $20,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$1,661,971Other$509,267Human Services$110,500Youth Development$110,000Philanthropy$97,483Education$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,482,092 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $179,879 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LANIER INC: $110,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $82,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION: $66,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPGA TOUR INC: $26,136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIREDU INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY CRISTO REY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCRISTO REY BIRMINGHAM WORK STUDY: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $14,568 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJunior Achievement of North Florida Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJARRARD BURCH FOUNDATIONINC: $8,915 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL CAMPS FOR SPECIAL KIDS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA10.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mansfield Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mansfield Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pga Tour Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mansfield Cares Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mansfield Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mansfield Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home