· Private foundation
Manna Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $100k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SALT LAKE CITY MISSION | $10,000 |
| SALT LAKE CITY MISSION | $10,000 |
| PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER | $8,500 |
| FAMILY PROMISE | $8,180 |
| PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER | $8,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF TULSA | $8,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE - SALT LAKE | $8,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE | $7,000 |
| SALT CITY UNDERGROUND CHURCH | $6,142 |
| CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER | $6,000 |
| CITY RESCUE MISSION | $5,200 |
| LIFE NET | $5,125 |
| GODS GARAGE | $5,000 |
| MONTANA FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| HOLDING OUT HELP | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CITY RESCUE MISSION INC4× · 2020–2024 · $51k · revenue +22%- RMRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC4× · 2019–2022 · $45k · revenue +9%
- WPWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- UFUTAH FOOD BANKone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +5%
- EFEVES FUNDone grant, 2021 · $4k
- BHBECAUSE HE FIRST LOVED USone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.
Community outreach and church services
To provide food for the homeless
The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.
Community outreach
To provide free food to homeless, veterans, and others
Our mission is to love, house, and equip men, women and children. coming from chronic unemployment, recovery, or an endless cycle of homelessness, our residents experience a clean, safe home where transforming their life can begin.…
We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…
Food bank - to assist those families who face the dilemma of paying rent or buying food.
Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.
Housing the homeless
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Spy Hop Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Family Promise - Salt Lake ↗
- Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds Jesus House Inc ↗
- Who funds WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds FILL THE POT MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds KATHERYNE B PAYNE EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Toward Jerusalem Council II ↗
- Who funds Holding Out HELP ↗
- Who funds DARBY BREAD BOX ↗
- Who funds HOPE RESCUE MISSION OF THE CITY OF READING ↗
- Who funds SPY HOP PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds DARBY FIRE DEPT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Manna Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.