Skip to content

· Public charity

Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies.

$7.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.3MReligion$166kPhilanthropy$145kHuman Services$31kHealth$30kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $300,753, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,571,130 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,270,377 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $284k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GAITHERSBURG HELP INC$31,200
SENECA CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH$31,200
ONE ACRE FARM$28,433
SANDY SPRING GARDENS LLC$25,090
GREENWAY FARMS LLC$20,668
Individual grant recipient$20,247
CHIRANDU FARMS LLC$20,247
COMMON ROOT FARM$20,000
THE FARM AT OUR HOUSE$20,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF MARYLAND$16,650
BELLA VITA FARM$12,680
SMALL THINGS MATTER$12,500
SAVAGE ACRES FARM$12,500
AMERICAN MUSLIM SENIOR SOCIETY$12,480
DODO FARMS$9,058
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN MUSLIM SENIOR SOCIETY: $12k → 8%RED WIGGLER COMMUNITY FARM: $20k → 8%RAINBOW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$612k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
31

Total granted

$1.1M
$542k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+27%

Still filing today

21%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GAITHERSBURG HELP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $307k · revenue +98%
  • NN
    NOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $72k · revenue +162%
  • AI
    AFRITHRIVE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • SW
    SO WHAT ELSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $145k · revenue 0%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FARMSHARE
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue +19%
  • HI
    HEALTHCARE INITIATIVE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nourishing Bethesda Inc

Fighting food insecurity in our area by providing nutritious food and community support to our neighbors in need, as well as offering and linking our clients to wraparound resources that will enable them to build healthy and stable lives.

Human Services
2
Common Good City Farm

Common Good City Farm is an urban farm in Washington, DC, where community members source fresh food, see sustainable urban agriculture in action, and learn healthy skills. Our mission is to sustain and support a more equitable community…

Food & Nutrition
3
Arlington Food Assistance Center

To provide dignified access to free groceries for qualified families in Arlington, VA and surrounding counties.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
5
Comfort Food of Washington County Inc

The mission of Comfort Food Community is to fight rural hunger with innovative programming that expands access to healthy food and builds community partnerships for lasting change.

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Equality Initiative Inc

Food Equality Initiative fights for nutrition security and health equity for all.

Food & Nutrition
7
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

—
8
Our Neighbors Farm & Pantry

The mission of our neighbors farm & pantry is to meet the hunger needs of our community by aquiring, growing, and distributing food and to provide education on nutrition and sustainable gardening.

—
9
Crossroads Community Food Network Inc

Improving community health through local food access.

Food & Nutrition
10
Ugk Community First Corp

UGK Community First provides a consistent source of nutritious and healthy chef prepared meals to food insecure families who live in underserved communities as well as those who find themselves in food insecure situations due to…

Food & Nutrition
11
Farmer Foodshare Inc

Our mission is to increase access to fresh, local food for all while supporting the viability of marginalized farmers to create a more equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
12
Nourishmke Inc

NourishMKE is the largest network of community food centers in Milwaukee. We provide encouraging spaces to select free quality foods, and explore nutrition and wellbeing. The foods are thoughtfully sourced to offer options and reduce…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Farmshare; the most unlike its peers is Healthcare Initiative Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GAITHERSBURG HELP INC: $307,021 · OtherGAITHERSBURG HELP INCSENECA CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH: $126,956 · OtherSENECA CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCHONE ACRE FARM: $85,483 · OtherONE ACRE FARMSANDY SPRING GARDENS LLC: $62,672 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $55,247 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,200 · OtherCHIRANDU FARMS LLC: $46,247 · Other+35 more: $547,325 · Other+35 moreCOMMUNITY FARMSHARE: $75,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY F…NOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC: $71,616 · Food & NutritionNOURISH NOW…The Upcounty Hub Inc: $23,000 · Food & NutritionThe Upcount…MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMONTGOMERY …SO WHAT ELSE INC: $145,000 · PhilanthropySO WHAT E…RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC: $19,565 · Human ServicesAMERICAN MUSLIM SENIOR SOCIETY INC: $12,480 · Human ServicesMID-COUNTY UNITED MINISTRIES INC: $5,997 · Human ServicesRAINBOW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHCARE INITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $10,000 · HealthAFRITHRIVE INC: $35,400 · Community ImprovementThe Charles Koiner Center for Urban Farming Incorporated: $15,000 · Environment
Other$1,281,151Food & Nutrition$179,616Philanthropy$145,000Human Services$43,042Health$40,000Community Improvement$35,400Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGAITHERSBURG HELP INC: $307,021 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetSO WHAT ELSE INC: $145,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FARMSHARE: $75,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC: $71,616 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAFRITHRIVE INC: $35,400 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHEALTHCARE INITIATIVE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Upcounty Hub Inc: $23,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC: $19,565 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe Shepherds Table Inc: $15,051 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Charles Koiner Center for Urban Farming Incorporated: $15,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSMALL THINGS MATTER INC: $12,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMID-COUNTY UNITED MINISTRIES INC: $5,997 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRAINBOW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GAITHERSBURG HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds SO WHAT ELSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FARMSHARE ↗
  • Who funds NOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRITHRIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHCARE INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Upcounty Hub Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Shepherds Table Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Charles Koiner Center for Urban Farming Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SMALL THINGS MATTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MUSLIM SENIOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOOD COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC32× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Healthcare Initiative Foundation · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Capital Area Food Bank Inc · Adventist Healthcare Inc · William S Abell Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Mead Family Foundation · The Morningstar Philanthropic Foundation D/B/A the Morningstar Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Manna Food Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Manna Food Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 41%
  • Afrithrive Inc: 41% of income from government
  • The Upcounty Hub Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Manna Food Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph