Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mangas Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$168kReligion$102kHousing & Shelter$42kFood & Nutrition$42kHuman Services$23kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$5kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UVA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION-BUILDING CAM$20,000
ST ANDREWS UMC - CO$15,000
UVA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$7,500
MILE HIGH MINISTRIES - JOSHUA STATI$5,000
SHARE OUR SPARE - CHICAGO$5,000
UVA COLLEGE OF AS$5,000
WASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUC$5,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$5,000
URBAN PEAK - DENVER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
UPSIDE OF DOWNS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UPSIDE OF DOWNS: $2k → 10%UPSIDE OF DOWNS: $2k → 10%UPSIDE OF DOWNS: $1k → 10%UPSIDE OF DOWNS: $1k → 10%UPSIDE OF DOWNS: $1k → 10%UPSIDE OF DOWNS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$368k · 13 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$368k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

46%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    URBAN PEAK DENVER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +108%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +23%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - JEFFERSON TRUST
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • CC
    CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW CANAAN
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • CC
    CONGREGATION CHURCH OF NEW CANAAN
    one grant, 2018 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
2
Habitat for Humanity East Bay Silicon Valley

We believe everyone deserves a decent place to live. by building, preserving, and expanding fair access to affordable homeownership, habitat partners with people and families to build strong futures on the foundation of a stable home.

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity New York City and Westcherster County Inc

Habitat for humanity new york city and westchester county transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
4
Greater Charlottesville Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity greater…

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of Frederick County Md

The organization's mission is "seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope." in frederick, that mission drives the organization to partner with individuals and…

—
6
Housing Initiative Partnership Inc

Housing initiative partnership, inc. (hip) develops innovative affordable housing, revitalizes neighborhoods and equips people to achieve their housing and financial goals. hip's vision is that every person lives in high-quality affordable…

Housing & Shelter
7
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
8
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Lowell Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity of greater lowell…

Housing & Shelter
9
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
10
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity Central Arizona

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

—
12
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richmond Metro Habitat for Humanity; the most unlike its peers is Upside of Downs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREWS UMC - CO: $81,000 · OtherST ANDREWS UMC - COUVA JEFFERSON TRUST: $60,000 · OtherUVA JEFFERSON TRUSTUVA COLLEGE OF AS: $35,000 · OtherUVA COLLEGE OF ASUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - JEFFERSON TRUST: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - JEFFERSON TRUSTUVA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION-BUILDING CAM: $20,000 · OtherUVA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION-BUILDING CAMCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW CANAAN: $18,000 · OtherCONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW CANAANCONGREGATION CHURCH OF NEW CANAAN: $17,500 · OtherCONGREGATION CHURCH OF NEW CANAANMILE HIGH MINISTRIES - JOSHUA STATI: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $60,000 · Other+10 moreUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK …Philabundance: $15,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabunda…URBAN PEAK DENVER: $30,000 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $2,200 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUPSIDE OF DOWNS: $8,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $1,000 · International
Other$326,500Education$50,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Housing & Shelter$32,200Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$8,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN PEAK DENVER: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPhilabundance: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPSIDE OF DOWNS: $8,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetRICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rock Found: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN PEAK DENVER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds UPSIDE OF DOWNS ↗
  • Who funds RICHMOND METRO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds The Rock Found ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mangas Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mangas Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mangas Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph