Skip to content

· Private foundation

Manat Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$8.5MReligion$3.2MEducation$3.0MPhilanthropy$2.1MHuman Services$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.0MInternational$865kArts & Culture$116kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $158k
  • $250k+6 grants · $6.4M
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH EMETH$2,000,000
ANN ARBOR ACADEMY$1,039,950
HEBREW FREE LOAN$1,005,737
YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH$1,000,000
LEBONHEUR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,000,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DAVID ADOM$400,000
GENESIS OF ANN ARBOR$100,000
Individual grant recipient$58,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES WASHTENAW$30,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION - MI$30,000
LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
UJA-JCC GREENWICH$20,000
SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION$15,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 7%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $135k → 8%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $1.5M → 8%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $350k → 8%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $75k → 8%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $25k → 8%LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
TN
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 25 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
24

Total granted

$14M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GARRETT'S SPACE
    3× · 2020–2024 · $3.6M · revenue +566% · 64% of their budget
  • LL
    LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +199%
  • AA
    ANN ARBOR ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +198% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • BC
    BOULDER CREST FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +34%
  • SF
    SCHULTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -45%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
6
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
7
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
9
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
11
Flint Jewish Federation

To further the welfare of the jewish community

Philanthropy
12
Michigan Israel Business Accelerator

Accelerating michigan's economic growth, one israeli innovation at a time.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Schultz Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
17/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BETH EMETH: $2,000,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EMETHST JUDE CHILDREN'S - CRAFT ROOM: $1,900,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S - CRAFT ROOMLEBONHEUR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,703,000 · OtherLEBONHEUR CHILDREN'S HOSPITALJEWISH FED-TAMARACK CAMPS: $1,044,651 · OtherJEWISH FED-TAMARACK CAMPSTHE JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY: $500,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCYJEWISH FED-MILLER YOUTH MENTAL HLTH: $450,000 · Other+38 more: $1,160,343 · Other+38 moreGARRETT'S SPACE: $3,611,497 · HealthGARRETT'S SPACE+8 more: $71,500 · HealthLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $2,014,109 · Human ServicesLIVING & LEARNING…BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $1,004,108 · Human ServicesBOULDER CREST FOU…LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $135,000 · Human Services+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $1,083,237 · PhilanthropyHEBREW FREE…SCHULTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropySCHULTZ FAM…+2 more: $17,500 · PhilanthropyANN ARBOR ACADEMY INC: $1,069,950 · EducationYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $1,000,000 · Religion+1 more: $10,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $865,000 · International
Other$8,757,994Health$3,682,997Human Services$3,178,217Philanthropy$2,100,737Education$1,069,950Religion$1,010,000International$865,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARRETT'S SPACE: $3,611,497 over 3y, 64% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $2,014,109 over 5y, 21% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $1,083,237 over 3y, 68% of budgetANN ARBOR ACADEMY INC: $1,069,950 over 3y, 34% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $1,004,108 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSCHULTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $865,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $135,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPenrickton Center for Blind Children: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN ARTS ACCESS: $6,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMICHIGAN UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE IVY TABLE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARRETT'S SPACE ↗
  • Who funds LIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ANN ARBOR ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHULTZ FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds UJA FEDERATION OF GREENWICH INC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Penrickton Center for Blind Children ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Marjory & Donald Epstein Family Charitable Foundation · The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation · The Lisa and Brian Meer Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Woll-Yellin Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Harold and Jean Grossman Family Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · Ford Philanthropy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Manat Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Manat Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Manat Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Manat Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Manat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph