Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Manat Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.9M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
28
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
46%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$2,000,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 22
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$31M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 46% of the organizations Manat Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 11% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $593k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving27$6.9M56%
FY202413$5.5M46%
FY202322$220k36%
FY202221$2.7M43%
FY202115$1.7M67%
FY202016$3.7Mn/a
81% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$8.5MReligion$3.2MEducation$3.0MPhilanthropy$2.1MHuman Services$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.0MInternational$865kArts & Culture$116kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
TN
DC
LA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Garrett's Space$3,611,497364%
Living & Learning Enrichment Center$2,014,109521%
Temple Beth Emeth$2,000,0001n/a
Hebrew Free Loan Association$1,083,237368%
Ann Arbor Academy Inc$1,069,950334%
Boulder Crest Foundation$1,004,10815%
Schultz Family Foundation$1,000,00012%
Yivo Institute for Jewish Research Inc$1,000,0001n/a
American Friends of Magen David Adom$865,00020%
Leader Dogs for the Blind$135,00011%
Show all 33 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 31 recipients with no EIN on record ($6.5M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Manat Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 24 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGarrett's Space: $3,611,497 over 3y, 64% of budgetLiving & Learning Enrichment Center: $2,014,109 over 5y, 21% of budgetHebrew Free Loan Association: $1,083,237 over 3y, 68% of budgetAnn Arbor Academy Inc: $1,069,950 over 3y, 34% of budgetBoulder Crest Foundation: $1,004,108 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSchultz Family Foundation: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Magen David Adom: $865,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLeader Dogs for the Blind: $135,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetForgotten Harvest Inc: $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYad Ezra: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetShades of Pink Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetJewish Family Service: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGleaners Community Food Bank of Southeastern Michigan: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPenrickton Center for Blind Children: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Leket Israel Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Arts Access: $6,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMichigan United Cerebral Palsy: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTower Cancer Research Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Michigan: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMichigan Dyslexia Institute Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Ivy Table Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Federation of America Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 24.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Marjory & Donald Epstein Family Charitable Foundation · The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation · The Lisa and Brian Meer Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Woll-Yellin Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Harold and Jean Grossman Family Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · Ford Philanthropy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Manat Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Manat Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Manat Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Manat Foundation

How much does Manat Foundation give?
Manat Foundation reported 28 grants totaling $6,866,187 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 22 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Manat Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (41%), Religion (15%), Education (14%).
Who are Manat Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: Garrett's Space ($3.6M), Living & Learning Enrichment Center ($2.0M), Temple Beth Emeth ($2.0M).
Does Manat Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 46% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Manat Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Manat Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan, Marjory & Donald Epstein Family Charitable Foundation, The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation.
Where is Manat Foundation based?
Manat Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Manat’s filings →

More from the funding graph