Skip to content

· Public charity

Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

$24M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$530k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$7.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.4MEducation$3.9MHealth$3.6MScience & Tech$1.6MHuman Services$1.2MCommunity Improvement$250k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $2,262,905, the rows itemized in this filing. The $23,969,448 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,706,543 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $591k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$203,525
Median grant
5
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JHPIEGO (JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY)$530,498
VITAL STRATEGIES INC$468,396
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$327,489
THE POPULATION COUNCIL$315,337
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS$203,525
BRAC USA INC$164,013
DIMAGI INC$106,980
ZENYSIS TECHNOLOGIES INC$62,183
THREE STONES INTERNATIONA$53,854
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE MIDWIVES$30,630
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DIMAGI INC: $276k → 8%UMASS: $192k → 11%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITA: $212k → 16%BRAC USA INC: $211k → 17%ACESO COMPANY: $250k → 12%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $258k → 7%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE MIDWIVES: $280k → 8%JHPIEGO (JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY): $1.1M → 19%DIMAGI INC: $250k → 8%BRAC USA INC: $164k → 17%POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $1.2M → 14%ACESO COMPANY: $150k → 12%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $204k → 7%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE MIDWIVES: $269k → 8%JHPIEGO (JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY): $1.0M → 19%DIMAGI INC: $215k → 8%BRAC USA INC: $161k → 17%POPULATION SERVICES INTER: $1.2M → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $204k → 7%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE MIDWIVES: $219k → 8%JHPIEGO (JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY): $788k → 19%DIMAGI INC: $147k → 8%BRAC USA INC: $138k → 17%POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $1.1M → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $165k → 7%AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE: $118k → 8%JHPIEGO (JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY): $530k → 19%DIMAGI INC: $107k → 8%ACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: $94k → 17%RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT: $416k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $97k → 7%JHPIEGO (JOHN HOPKINS UNI: $511k → 19%RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT I: $408k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $1.8M → 19%VITAL STRATEGIES INC: $468k → 17%ACESO GLOBAL: $406k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $1.3M → 19%VITAL STRATEGIES INC: $89k → 17%ACESO GLOBAL: $365k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $595k → 19%THE POPULATION COUNCIL: $315k → 17%RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $175k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $474k → 19%THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $203k → 17%POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $104k → 14%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $327k → 19%THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $190k → 17%THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $154k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MD
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $20M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $8.8M to organizations and $12M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$10M · 51% · 46 grants · 31709 people

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

South Asia$5.2M · 26% · 2 grants · 1749 people

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

Russia and Neighboring States$2.2M · 11% · 3254 people
East Asia and the Pacific$2.2M · 11% · 4 grants · 5315 people

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

Central America and the Caribbean$336k · 2% · 3 grants · 2380 people

Stated purpose: SEE PART V

Middle East and North Africa$49k · 0% · 299 people
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 19% of Management Sciences for Health Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Management Sciences for Health Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 18 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$21M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+23%

Still filing today

61%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +40%
  • RF
    RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $998k · revenue +76%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $928k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BANK RECONSTRUCTION
    one grant, 2020 · $452k
  • E
    Encoregraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $400k · revenue +619%
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $212k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
5
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

Improve health care and population health by assessing and enhancing the quality of resident and fellow physicians' education through advancements in accreditation and education.

Education
6
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
7
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
8
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
9
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
12
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Health International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Encore. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $4,442,674 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $3,578,543 · OtherPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT: $1,395,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENTDIMAGI INC: $924,863 · OtherDIMAGI INCINTERNATIONAL BANK RECONSTRUCTION: $452,319 · Other+6 more: $955,844 · Other+6 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,907,871 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVER…RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $998,223 · InternationalRESULTS FOR DEVE…THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $862,371 · InternationalTHE POPULATION C…BRAC USA INC: $673,068 · InternationalBRAC USA INCVITAL STRATEGIES INC: $557,674 · InternationalVITAL STRATEGIES…ACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $124,706 · International+1 more: $69,031 · InternationalAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $928,284 · HealthAMERICAN AC…ACESO GLOBAL INC: $771,093 · HealthACESO GLOBA…Encore: $400,000 · HealthEncore+1 more: $62,572 · HealthAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES: $916,767 · Community ImprovementBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $17,248 · Science & Tech
Other$11,749,243Education$3,907,871International$3,285,073Health$2,161,949Community Improvement$916,767Science & Tech$17,248

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3,907,871 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $3,578,543 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $998,223 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $928,284 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES: $916,767 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC: $862,371 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetACESO GLOBAL INC: $771,093 over 2y, 34% of budgetBRAC USA INC: $673,068 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetVITAL STRATEGIES INC: $557,674 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $124,706 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $69,031 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS: $62,572 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE: $17,248 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES ↗
  • Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ACESO GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Encore ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS ↗
  • Who funds BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Path · Gavi Alliance · Jhpiego Corporation · Family Health International Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Management Sciences for Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Management Sciences for Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Management Sciences for Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph