Skip to content

· Private foundation

Making Life Better Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$373kHousing & Shelter$50kReligion$20kInternational$20kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$5kScience & Tech$3k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$96,000
WON BY ONE TO JAMAICA$24,000
THE CENTER FOR APPLIED LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP$15,000
PARTNERS IN HOUSING INC A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CORP$15,000
UNIVERSITY SCHOOLS$7,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTH ALABAMA$5,000
COLORADO CONSORTIUM FOR EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE ED$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $314k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $96k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $46k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $46k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $42k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $40k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $40k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 11%TRI LAKES CARES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Making Life Better Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Making Life Better Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$421k · 4 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$421k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+93%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterReligionInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $311k · revenue +78%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR APPLIED LEARNING &
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +62%
  • WB
    WON BY ONE TO JAMAICA
    2× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • GM
    Ghana Make a Differencegraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +46%
  • TC
    TRI-LAKES CARESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +93%
  • MB
    M Bledsoe
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Foothills Food Bank

Provide food and financial assistance to the local community.

—
3
Homes for Homes aka Homes 4 Homes

Homes 4 Homes brings safe housing to people in developing countries. We empower local leaders and construction teams to build homes for at risk members of their own communities. Safe and secure housing positively impacts multiple…

Housing & Shelter
4
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
5
Sonshine Ministries International

We provide homes, a healthy diet, medical treatment, quality education, and counseling for orphaned abused and neglected children in Tanzania, East Africa. Sonshine works directly with Child Welfare Services of Tanzania. CWS provides…

—
6
Acres of Diamonds

Acres of Diamonds offfers moms and their children a community-centered, non-traditional approach to transitional housing. our mission is to break the cycle of homelessness by providing holistic, long-term solutions that empower families to…

Health
7
Transition House

Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…

Housing & Shelter
8
Community Action Services and Food Bank

Community Action Services and Food Bank works to stabilize families and then rebuild their lives. We help meet their basic needs (food, shelter, housing) while providing the long-term solutions needed to rebuild their financial and social…

Human Services
9
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
10
Foothills Food Bank

The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.

—
11
Honduras Compassion Partners Inc

HCP, in partnership with other non-profits, community organizations, volunteers and businesses, provides education, clean water, latrines, and medical services to enhance self-sufficiency, healthy living and dignity within the La Paz…

International
12
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-Lakes Cares; the most unlike its peers is University Schools. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $311,000 · Human ServicesRANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR APPLIED LEARNING &: $55,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR…University Schools: $7,000 · EducationUniversity Sch…WON BY ONE TO JAMAICA: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterWON BY ONE …Partners in Housing Inc: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterPartners in…Ghana Make a Difference: $20,000 · InternationalStableStrides: $20,000 · ReligionCOLORADO CONSORTIUM FOR EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE ED: $3,000 · OtherM Bledsoe: $2,500 · OtherFood Bank of North Alabama Inc: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$313,500Education$62,000Housing & Shelter$50,000International$20,000Religion$20,000Other$5,500Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $311,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR APPLIED LEARNING &: $55,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetWON BY ONE TO JAMAICA: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGhana Make a Difference: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetStableStrides: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPartners in Housing Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity Schools: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFood Bank of North Alabama Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pikes Peak Community FoundationCO13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Making Life Better Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Making Life Better Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Making Life Better’s filings →

    More from the funding graph