Skip to content

· Private foundation

Make Disciples Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$756kEducation$102kArts & Culture$85kCivil Rights$50kCommunity Improvement$50kHousing & Shelter$12kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$12,052
Median grant
6
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC$100,000
NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION$50,000
USA TRANSFORM DBA UNITED IN PURPOSE$25,000
THRIVE AMERICA$12,052
LIBERTY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF SARASOTA INC$1,543
ELEVATEHIM MINISTRIES$1,200
OVERLAND MISSIONS INC$1,000
SARASOTA HOPE HOUSE INC$256
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OVERLAND MISSIONS INC: $1k → 10%THE TWIG CARES INC: $5k → 9%THE TWIG CARES INC: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
OH
CO
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 86% of Make Disciples Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 14%.

Make Disciples Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$889k · 6 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$889k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $401k · revenue -14%
  • BC
    BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k
  • LC
    LIBERTY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF SARASOTA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $102k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • PA
    Pro Athletes Outreach
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +68%
  • THE TWIG CARES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • N
    NA
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
2
Pursue Ministries

Pursue Ministries has the mission to pursue an eternal impact by introducing others to Jesus Christ, teaching the Bible and training disciples through one-on-one meetings, small groups, resources, retreats and seminars.

Religion
3
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
4
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
5
Influencers Global Ministries

Religious organization devoted to strengthening members' personal faith.

Religion
6
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
7
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
8
For the Gospel Ministries

Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…

Religion
9
Praise Broadcasting Inc

Praise broadcasting's (praisefm) vision is to see every tribe and nation experiencing jesus together. our mission is simple: together we help people discover and worship jesus. more than a radio station, praisefm is a place where…

Religion
10
World Outreach Ministries Inc

World outreach ministries, inc. exists to assist christian leaders and to reach the nations with a positive message of faith, grace, and victory through jesus christ. this is accomplished through support of missionaries, missionary…

—
11
Faith Speaks World Outreach

World outreach

Religion
12
Explore God (Formerly Known As We Inc)

Explore god creates and leverages quality content and media that enables young adults, seekers, and christians to explore god, experience god, and engage in god's plan for their life. using cutting-edge technology, we facilitate spiritual…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is AVENUE941 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $400,500 · PhilanthropyILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INCBAYSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SARASOTA INC: $200,000 · OtherBAYSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SARAS…USA TRANSFORM DBA UNITED IN PURPOSE: $100,000 · OtherUSA TRANSFORM DBA UNITED IN PURPO…THRIVE AMERICA: $12,052 · Other+3 more: $3,516 · OtherPro Athletes Outreach: $150,000 · ReligionPro Athletes Out…+3 more: $3,146 · ReligionLIBERTY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF SARASOTA INC: $101,543 · EducationLIBERTY CH…NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $85,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL …THE TWIG CARES INC: $5,425 · Human ServicesOVERLAND MISSIONS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,912 · InternationalAVENUE941 INC: $1,500 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$400,500Other$315,568Religion$153,146Education$101,543Arts & Culture$85,000Human Services$6,425International$1,912Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $400,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLIBERTY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF SARASOTA INC: $101,543 over 2y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION: $85,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE TWIG CARES INC: $5,425 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $1,912 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARASOTA HOPE HOUSE INC: $1,756 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetELEVATE HIM INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGALATIANS 62 INC: $190 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bill & Ann Templeton Foundation Inc · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Make Disciples Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Make Disciples Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Make Disciples Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Make Disciples Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Make Disciples’ filings →

    More from the funding graph