Skip to content

· Private foundation

Majerus Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MFood & Nutrition$613kReligion$250kHuman Services$210kHealth$125kRecreation & Sports$65kEnvironment$25kCivil Rights$25k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$433k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW MADISON$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$5,000
UW OSHKOSH$5,000
CARTHAGE COLLEGE$5,000
LUKE HOMAN FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $188k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE GATHERING OF SOUTHEAST WI: $3k → 17%JOURNEY HOUSE: $100k → 17%JOUNEY HOUSE INC: $85k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
WI
NY
IA
IN
OH
NJ
MO
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 15 repeat orgs$692k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
39

Total granted

$2.0M
$687k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+26%

Still filing today

40%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $385k · revenue +7%
  • MU
    Marquette University
    7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +46%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • DS
    DIVINE SAVIOR HOLY ANGELS
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • ABCD INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +11%
  • NS
    NORTH SUBURBAN SPECIAL OLYMPICS
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
5
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
6
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
7
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
8
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
9
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
10
Lourdes University

Lourdes university, rooted in catholic and franciscan traditions, provides a values-centered education that enriches lives and advances academic excellence through the integration of the liberal arts and professional studies.

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc; the most unlike its peers is Luke Homan Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST BENS COMMUNITY MEAL: $585,000 · OtherST BENS COMMUNITY MEALNOTRE DAME MIDDLE SCHOOL OF MILWAUK: $255,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME MIDDLE SCHOOL OF MILWAUKDIVINE SAVIOR HOLY ANGELS: $250,000 · OtherDIVINE SAVIOR HOLY ANGELSSAINT THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL INC: $230,091 · OtherSAINT THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL INCUW MADISON: $70,000 · Other+30 more: $366,642 · Other+30 moreST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $385,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITYMarquette University: $70,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $30,000 · EducationLUKE HOMAN FOUNDATION INC: $26,500 · Education+13 more: $90,000 · Education+13 moreJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $185,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesABCD INC: $100,000 · HealthMILWAUKEE RIVERKEEPER INC: $25,000 · Environment
Other$1,756,733Education$601,500Human Services$187,500Health$100,000Environment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $385,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOUSE INC: $185,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetABCD INC: $100,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetMarquette University: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE HOMAN FOUNDATION INC: $26,500 over 9y, 37% of budgetMILWAUKEE RIVERKEEPER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARROLL UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCollege of St Joseph the Worker Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATHERING OF SOUTHEAST WI INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABCD INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LUKE HOMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds CARTHAGE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Majerus Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Majerus Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Majerus Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph