Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Maine Youth Camping Foundation D/B/A Maine Summer Camps

To support and promote meaningful developmental, educational, environmental, and recreational experiences for children by engaging in activities that enhance the quality and effectiveness of Maine's youth camps.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of Maine Youth Camping Foundation D/B/A Maine Summer Camps’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 31 grants below total $93,475 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $102,604 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,129 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$2,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$651k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camp Mechuwna$7,000
Agassiz Village$6,750
YMCA Camp of Maine$6,750
The Summer Camp$6,500
Camp Bishopswood (Episcopal Diocese)$6,250
University of Maine 4-H Camp at Greenland$4,575
West End House Girls Camp$3,500
West End House Boys Camp$3,500
Kieve Wavus Education Inc$3,000
Pine Island Camp$3,000
Camp Chewonki$3,000
Camp Wigwam$2,750
Kamp Kohut$2,500
Friends Camp - Quaker$2,500
Camp O-AT-KA$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Camp Berwick: $2k → 8%Camp Laughing Loon: $2k → 9%Kieve Wavus Education Inc: $3k → 9%YMCA Camp of Maine: $11k → 12%YMCA Camp of Maine: $9k → 12%YMCA Camp of Maine: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$172k · 7 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +61% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$172k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+61%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $27k · revenue +13%
  • AV
    AGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +312%
  • TS
    THE SUMMER CAMP INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $22k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +61%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • KC
    KUKUNSOOK CAMP OWNERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Camp Nakanawa

Empowering young women to have a lasting positive impact on society by strengthening their confidence, independence, and companionship for others.

Recreation & Sports
2
The Camp At Sunshine Farm
Philanthropy
3
Camp Tuckabatchee Inc

To provide recreational activities to youth

Recreation & Sports
4
Girl Scouts of Southeastern New England

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place. the girl scout leadership experience provides girls in kindergarten through twelfth grade with a variety of skill-building and leadership…

5
Fantasy Camps for Kids
Recreation & Sports
6
Camp Dudley Inc

To develop moral, personal, physical, and leadership skills in the spirit of fellowship and fun, enabling boys and girls to lead lives characterized by devotion to others.

7
George & Raymond Frank Foundation

The foundation operates a residential summer camp for boys located in Weld, Maine. The foundation is supported primarily through camper tuition and charitable donations.

Recreation & Sports
8
Penn-York Camp Association Inc

The mission of Penn-York Camp is to develop dedicated followers of Jesus Christ by building spirit, mind, and body, in a natural setting.

Recreation & Sports
9
Pine Cobble School Incorporated

Provide private school education for children from nursery school through grade 8

Education
10
Camp Susquehannock Inc

Camp Susquehannock operates a summer camp in the Endless Mountains in northeastern Pennsylvania that uses sports and other activities to develop confident, resilient, independent and happy young girls and boys.

Youth Development
11
Camp Claire Inc

Camp claire is a full-service, resident cooperative education summer camp open to persons ages seven through fourteen and provides a positive, nuturing environment that encourages curiosity and creativity.

Youth Development
12
Camp Billings

Camp billings is dedicated to enriching the lives of children by providing a summer camping experience in thetford, vermont on lake fairlee.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Summer Camp Inc and the most unlike its peers is Girl Scouts of Maine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsSenior and Low-Income Housi…Early Childhood and Element…Innovation & Systems ChangeInternational Child Welfare
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr19%9%20–35yr14%39%35–55yr14%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr14%44%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
1,637/16,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INC — $45,505 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM INCAGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHS — $26,250 · OtherAGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHSDIOCESE OF MAINE CAMP BISHOPSWOOD — $22,650 · OtherDIOCESE OF MAINE CAMP BISHOPSWOODTHE SUMMER CAMP INC — $22,000 · OtherTHE SUMMER CAMP INCIndividual grant recipient — $13,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $12,500 · OtherAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INCCamp Mechuwna — $9,250 · Other+13 more — $38,000 · Other+13 moreYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $26,780 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHR…Kieve Wavus Education Inc — $3,000 · Human ServicesKieve Wavus Ed…CAMP LAUGHING LOON — $1,540 · Human ServicesBERWICK BOYS FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS OF MAINE — $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOU…WEST END HOUSE GIRLS CAMP INC — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentWEST END …Timanous Foundation — $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentTimanous …Pine Island Camp — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsCamp O-AT-KA Inc — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsCHRISTIAN CAMPS & CONFERENCE INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsBIRCH ROCK CAMP — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsChewonki Foundation Inc — $3,000 · EnvironmentBrunswick-Topsham Land Trust Inc — $860 · EnvironmentBREAKWATER LEARNING — $2,000 · Education
Other$189,205Human Services$32,820Youth Development$21,000Recreation & Sports$9,000Environment$3,860Education$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $26,780 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAGASSIZ VILLAGE FOUNDED BY MR & MRS HARRY E BURROUGHS — $26,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC — $22,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF MAINE — $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPine Island Camp — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp O-AT-KA Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKWATER LEARNING — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRCH ROCK CAMP — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrunswick-Topsham Land Trust Inc — $860 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME21.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maine Youth Camping Foundation D/B/A Maine Summer Camps funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph