Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Main Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$541k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$900kHuman Services$383kEducation$194kHousing & Shelter$183kHealth$168kReligion$134kCommunity Improvement$125kCrime & Legal$99kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $392k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEAK PROUD$170,000
SPECIAL PALS$81,978
CITIZENS FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION$77,000
LAUREL HOUSE$62,820
ROTARY CLUB OF SEALY$24,000
GRACE FELLOWSHIP$20,000
CAFB$20,000
KATY RESPONDS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
SAUVER DES CHIEN RESCUE$15,000
MAKE A WISH$10,000
UPBRING$7,455
Individual grant recipient$2,600
Individual grant recipient$2,500
FRIENDS FOR LIFE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%FORT BEND WOMEN'S CENTER: $75k → 8%KATY RESPONDS: $40k → 16%KATY RESPONDS: $25k → 16%KATY RESPONDS: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
NY
SD
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 16 repeat orgs$793k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
26

Total granted

$1.6M
$554k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+24%

Still filing today

63%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $239k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Citizens For Animal Protection Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $391k · revenue +8%
  • SP
    Special Pals Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $371k · revenue +105%
  • KR
    Katy Responds
    3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • FB
    FORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -2%
  • GF
    GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH CORP
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • FB
    Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $69k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
3
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
4
Paws of Austin Protection of Animal Welfare Services

PAWS' purpose is to provide refuge to stray and unwanted animals. PAWS' mission is to prevent cruelty to all animals by promoting humane standards through education and example, to provide care and shelter for homeless animals, aid in the…

Animals
5
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
6
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
7
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
8
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
9
Texas Rescue Inc
Animals
10
Houston Cares Animal Rescue

Houston Cares Rescue is a volunteer organization rescuing animals from the streets, and occasionally from shelters, in Houston, TX, and caring for them primarily with foster families until a loving home can be found. We operate a…

Animals
11
Hope 4 La Pawz

Rescue companion animals from the la paz area of the baja peninsula; rehabilitate them; and find loving, permanent homes for them in mexico, the us, and canada. provide education to the public concerning the proper care of companion…

Animals
12
Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc

The Humane Society of Tampa Bay is dedicated to ending animal homelessness and providing care and comfort for companion animals in need. Our vision is "Leading the way because every life counts". In 2025, we saved 10,631 animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission and the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Veteran Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Developmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%17%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr10%30%35–55yr13%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%10%<5yr16%11%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr10%63%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,774

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAUREL HOUSE — $172,820 · OtherLAUREL HOUSEPEAK PROUD INC — $170,000 · OtherPEAK PROUD INCTEXANA CENTER — $165,800 · OtherTEXANA CENTERROTARY CLUB OF SEALY — $99,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF SEALYIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH CORP — $70,000 · OtherGRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH CORPSAUVER DES CHIEN RESCUE — $53,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · Other+29 more — $250,480 · Other+29 moreCitizens For Animal Protection Inc — $391,000 · AnimalsCitizens For Animal Protection IncSpecial Pals Inc — $370,978 · AnimalsSpecial Pals IncHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $41,000 · Animals+3 more — $42,775 · AnimalsKaty Responds — $85,000 · Human ServicesFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS — $75,000 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $40,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $40,000 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital — $36,000 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $15,000 · Health+2 more — $3,000 · HealthFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc — $68,500 · Civil RightsPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $25,000 · Public BenefitSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $16,000 · Education
Other$1,096,100Animals$845,753Human Services$160,000Health$134,000Civil Rights$68,500Public Benefit$25,000Education$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCitizens For Animal Protection Inc — $391,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetSpecial Pals Inc — $370,978 over 4y, 13% of budgetKaty Responds — $85,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS — $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc — $68,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $41,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $36,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDIZZY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE — $23,875 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM STREET RESCUE INC — $13,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE Rescue Coalition — $5,400 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFAITH IN PRACTICE — $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FROM FEAR INC — $500 over 1y, 20% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Citizens For Animal Protection Inc
  • Who funds Special Pals Inc
  • Who funds Katy Responds
  • Who funds FORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS
  • Who funds Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital
  • Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds DIZZY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds FREEDOM STREET RESCUE INC
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds SAVE Rescue Coalition

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX21.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Baker Hughes Foundation · The Henderson-Wessendorff Foundation · Houston Petset · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Petco Love · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Main Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Main Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Main Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph