Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maher Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$341k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$451kEducation$271kRecreation & Sports$246kInternational$40kSocial Science$30kCommunity Improvement$20kEnvironment$20kArts & Culture$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $197k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$100,000
PREP FOR PREP$97,300
US SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION$28,000
WORLD CUP DREAMS FOUNDATION$25,000
NEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS AND LEARNING$21,400
ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES$10,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$10,000
ROARING FORK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$10,000
PESTALOZZI US CHILDREN'S CHARITY$10,000
WORLD CUP DREAMS FOUNDATION$5,100
GAR FOUNDATION$5,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$5,000
ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES$4,700
JAZZ ASPEN SNOWMASS$3,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$2,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $2k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$508k · 15 repeat orgs$524k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$508k
$499k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’23’24
EducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WORLD CUP DREAMS FOUNDATION FKA SFI FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +83%
  • PU
    PESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +6%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • FC
    Fidelity Charitable Giving
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • CC
    CLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +60%
  • TS
    THE SCOTT FAMILY FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $51k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Financial Planning Inc

Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.

Human Services
2
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

5
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Breck School

We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.

Education
8
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

9
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
10
The Aspen Group

The aspen group is a non-partisan, by invitation only, healthcare forum. our members, with a track record of leadership in both the public and private sectors, share ideas, make recommendations, and serve as a resource to policy makers,…

Philanthropy
11
Wyoming Seminary College Preparatory School

Wyoming seminary inspires students to lead lives of integrity, purpose, and excellence by developing the critical skills and spirit of community necessary to succeed and serve in a global society.

Education
12
Ussa Investment Fund

Operates exclusively to manage the investment of endowment gifts made for the benefit of supporting the development, training, and competition of elite national, international, and development athletes in skiing and snowboarding.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gar Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Fidelity Charitable Giving — $250,000 · OtherFidelity Charitable GivingUS Ski & Snowboard Team Foundation — $96,000 · OtherUS Ski & Snowboard Team FoundationUS SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION — $73,000 · OtherUS SKI & SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATIONTHE SCOTT FAMILY FUND — $51,216 · OtherTHE SCOTT FAMILY FUNDScott Family Foundation (Fidelity Charitable) — $50,000 · OtherScott Family Foundation (Fidelity Charitable)NEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS AND LEARNING — $21,400 · Other+14 more — $65,400 · Other+14 morePREP FOR PREP — $144,700 · EducationPREP FOR PREPCLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS — $100,000 · EducationCLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLSRoaring Fork Schools Foundation — $20,000 · EducationRoaring Fork Schools Found…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $100,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INV…REBUILD METRO INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementREBUILD METR…WORLD CUP DREAMS FOUNDATION FKA SFI FOUNDATION — $55,100 · Recreation & SportsPESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $25,000 · Social ScienceASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $19,700 · Environment
Other$607,016Education$264,700Community Improvement$120,000Recreation & Sports$55,100Philanthropy$40,000Social Science$25,000Environment$19,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPREP FOR PREP — $144,700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLASSICAL CHARTER SCHOOLS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CUP DREAMS FOUNDATION FKA SFI FOUNDATION — $55,100 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetPESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC — $40,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRoaring Fork Schools Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetREBUILD METRO INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES — $19,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGAR FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN HOPE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $3,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CONNEC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maher Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Down Syndrome Association of Connec0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph