Skip to content
Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation

To support charitable, religious, scientific and educational organizations.

$214k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$178kAnimals$96kYouth Development$46kPhilanthropy$37kHousing & Shelter$32kHealth$20kEnvironment$20kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $196k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$139k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Musically Fed$34,000
Conscious Alliance$33,500
Central Texas Food Bank$25,000
Child Advocacy Network$20,000
Heal the Bay$20,000
Hill Country Elephant Preserv$20,000
Best Friends Animal Society$15,000
Malibu Foundation$15,000
The Street Dog Coalition$13,000
Red Feather Development Group$9,500
Fredericksburg Food Pantry$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CityKids Foundation: $28k → 17%Phoenix Indian Center: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
NC
HI
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 6 repeat orgs$196k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$230k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MUSICALLY FED
    2× · 2024–2025 · $68k · revenue 0%
  • TC
    THE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $66k · revenue 0%
  • TS
    The Street Dog Coalition
    2× · 2024–2025 · $36k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • CF
    CITYKIDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $28k · revenue -65%
  • DC
    Dempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • TP
    THE PAINTED TURTLE
    one grant, 2024 · $19k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Cat Adoption Team

To save the lives of homeless, sick and injured cats and to work with our community to provide feline expertise and quality programs and services for people and cats.

Animals
7
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
8
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
9
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
10
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
11
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
12
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Fredericksburg Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
5/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSICALLY FED: $67,500 · Food & NutritionMUSICALLY FEDTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $65,500 · Food & NutritionTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCECentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $25,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank IncThe Street Dog Coalition: $35,500 · AnimalsThe Street Dog Coalitio…GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $25,000 · AnimalsGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HOR…FRIENDS OF THE PRESERVE INC: $20,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE PRESERVE…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOC…CITYKIDS FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 · Human ServicesCITYKIDS F…PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPHOENIX IN…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII CO…RED FEATHER DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterDempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care: $20,000 · HealthHEAL THE BAY: $20,000 · EnvironmentChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $20,000 · OtherChild Abuse Ne…FREDERICKSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC: $19,500 · OtherFREDERICKSBURG…THE PAINTED TURTLE: $18,500 · OtherTHE PAINTED TU…
Food & Nutrition$158,000Animals$95,500Human Services$42,500Philanthropy$37,000Housing & Shelter$32,000Health$20,000Environment$20,000Other$58,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSICALLY FED: $67,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $65,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Street Dog Coalition: $35,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCITYKIDS FOUNDATION INC: $27,500 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDempsey Center for Quality Cancer Care: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFREDERICKSBURG FOOD PANTRY INC: $19,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetRED FEATHER DEVELOPMENT GROUP: $17,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home