Loading…
· Public charity
Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation
To support charitable, religious, scientific and educational organizations.
$268k
Granted FY2024
12
Grants
9
Communities
$37k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $243k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$76k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Hawaii Community Foundation$37,000
- Musically Fed$33,500
- Conscious Alliance$32,000
- CityKids Foundation$27,500
- The Street Dog Coalition$22,500
- The Dempsey Center$20,000
- The Painted Turtle$18,500
- Beloved Ashville$15,000
- Phoenix Indian Center$15,000
- Frederickburg Food Pantry$11,500
- Gentle Giants Draft Horses$10,000
- Red Feather Development Group$7,500
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Food Connect Co
Bridging the gaps in our food system to end hunger, build health, and eliminate food waste.
Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals... feeding san diego is on a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community…
Food & Nutrition
3
Dc Greens Inc
DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.
Community Improvement
4
The Dc Central Kitchen Inc
—
5
Feeding the Homeless Project Inc
Feeding homeless individuals in Downtown Atlanta.
Food & Nutrition
6
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank
Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.
Food & Nutrition
7
Food Bank of Central New York
Food acquisition and distribution
Food & Nutrition
8
Community Foodworks
Pioneering strategies for an equitable and resilient community-based food system.
—
9
A Well-Fed World
A global hunger relief food security and climate advocacy organization providing grants and research to advance plant-based foods and farming.
Food & Nutrition
10
CoreGiving Co
Fighting hunger with every dollar, hour, and meal.
Philanthropy
11
Foodshot Global Inc
Working to transform the food system into one that is more healthy, sustainable, and equitable.
Food & Nutrition
12
Healing Meals Foundation
Preparation and delivery of organic meals to families with a health crisis.
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fredericksburg Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Food & Nutrition$65,500Human Services$42,500Philanthropy$37,000Animals$32,500Housing & Shelter$22,500Health$20,000Youth Development$18,500Other$11,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Hawaii Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Musically Fed ↗
- Who funds Conscious Alliance ↗
- Who funds CityKids Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Street Dog Coalition ↗
- Who funds The Dempsey Center ↗
- Who funds The Painted Turtle ↗
- Who funds Beloved Ashville ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Indian Center ↗
- Who funds Frederickburg Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds Gentle Giants Draft Horses ↗
- Who funds Red Feather Development Group ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Musically Fed.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~21 months of operating runway; revenue held over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 833226653 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Musically Fed, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 21 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Magnolia Pearl Peace Warrior Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines