Skip to content

· Private foundation

Magnolia Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of Magnolia Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Magnolia Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $74k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’19
7
’20
4
’21
7
’22
4
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$81kRecreation & Sports$53kReligion$35kHuman Services$18kEnvironment$10kFood & Nutrition$9kHealth$6kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$375k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVA$30,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$25,000
CHRIST CHURCH$4,000
BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE MINISTRY INC$3,000
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,750
HOPE AND DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES$2,500
YOUNG LIFE$2,000
DONATIONS TO FAMILIES IN NEED$1,342
COOL EFFECT INC$1,200
NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,133
JDRF INTERNATIONAL$1,010
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABILITYFIRST: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Magnolia Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Magnolia Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 8 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -33% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$145k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-33%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEnvironmentHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    3× · 2019–2022 · $53k · revenue +80%
  • BE
    Beaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +31%
  • CE
    Cool Effect Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • A
    ABILITYFIRST
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

Philanthropy
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
7
National Philanthropic Trust

National philanthropic trust ("npt") is a public charity dedicated to increasing philanthropy in society by providing philanthropic expertise to donors, foundations and financial institutions, enabling them to realize their philanthropic…

Philanthropy
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
12
Terraset

Terraset uses philanthropic capital to purchase permanent, high-quality carbon removal. we pool donations from individuals, foundations, family offices, and donor advised funds, and make strategic purchases of high-quality carbon removal…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVA: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVAIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDONATIONS TO FAMILIES IN NEED: $13,862 · OtherDONATIONS TO FAMILIES IN NEEDIndividual grant recipient: $12,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH INC: $10,950 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH INCHOPE AND DELIVERANCE MINISTRIES: $8,458 · Other+18 more: $25,279 · Other+18 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $53,140 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTI…YOUNG LIFE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $40,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE U…Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc: $3,000 · EducationGordon-Conwell Th…Beaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc: $11,523 · ReligionCool Effect Inc: $4,700 · EnvironmentABILITYFIRST: $3,000 · Human ServicesBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,510 · Health
Other$166,249Youth Development$55,140Education$43,000Religion$11,523Environment$4,700Human Services$3,000Health$2,510

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $53,140 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc: $11,523 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCool Effect Inc: $4,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,326 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABILITYFIRST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,510 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION: $1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAWAII CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET PARTNERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Beaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cool Effect Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ABILITYFIRST ↗
  • Who funds Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HAWAII CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds PET PARTNERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Magnolia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Magnolia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Magnolia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph