Skip to content

· Private foundation

Magdovitz Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$585kReligion$12kHuman Services$7kArts & Culture$6kCrime & Legal$4kHealth$4kAnimals$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k8 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Foundation Memphis$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,600
Memphis Zoo$20,000
Memphis JCC$4,250
Memphis Jewish Federation$2,030
Individual grant recipient$500
ASPCA$400
Washington Lee Univ$200
Natl Wildlife Fund$150
Arts Memphis$100
PETA$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Last House On The Block: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
MA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$427k · 18 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
26

Total granted

$427k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+75%

Still filing today

39%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthAnimalsArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MZ
    Memphis Zoological Society
    7× · 2017–2026 · $22k · revenue +70%
  • MJ
    MEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    3× · 2018–2026 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • PO
    Protect Our Aquifer
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • DC
    DAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +24%
  • WR
    WOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
6
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
7
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
8
Jewish Community Center of Nashville

The gordon jewish community center welcomes all, builds community, and provides excellent programs rooted in jewish values to enrich the mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
9
Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee

The jewish federation of nashville is the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community. through its fund-raising, planning and community relations efforts, either independently or in partnership with other jewish…

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Community Center

The st. louis jewish community center enriches lives, builds community, promotes inclusivity and creates meaningful jewish experiences.

Human Services
11
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
12
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Jewish Federation; the most unlike its peers is Last House On the Block. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS: $589,200 · ReligionJEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHISIndividual grant recipient: $358,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $35,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+40 more: $64,420 · Other+40 moreMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $40,130 · PhilanthropyMemphis Zoological Society: $22,146 · Animals+2 more: $450 · AnimalsDAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureMEMPHIS PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $4,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $100 · Crime & LegalProtect Our Aquifer: $1,500 · Environment
Religion$589,200Other$458,056Philanthropy$40,130Animals$22,596Arts & Culture$5,100Crime & Legal$4,100Environment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS: $589,200 over 10y, 1.1% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION: $40,130 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMemphis Zoological Society: $22,146 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMEMPHIS PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLEE COUNTY JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProtect Our Aquifer: $1,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB): $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetB NAI B RITH: $276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUICIDE & CRISIS INTERVENTION SVC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LEE COUNTY JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Protect Our Aquifer ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds B NAI B RITH ↗
  • Who funds SUICIDE & CRISIS INTERVENTION SVC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds ARTSMEMPHIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lichterman Loewenberg FoundationTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation · Belz Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Wurzburg Fdn Warren & Marjorie · Reginald Wurzburg Foundation · The Goldsmith Family Foundation Inc · Herbert Shainberg Foundation · Plough Foundation · The Assisi Foundation of Memphis Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Magdovitz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Magdovitz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Magdovitz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph