Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Magdovitz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Magdovitz Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Memphis Jewish Federation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
17
4
18
5
19
4
20
6
21
3
22
4
23
4
24
1
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$585kReligion$12kHuman Services$7kArts & Culture$6kCrime & Legal$4kHealth$4kAnimals$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Memphis Jewish Federation$31,000
Individual grant recipient$25,550
Jewish Foundation Memphis$15,000
Jewish Federation of Lee & Charlotte County$1,000
B'nai Brith$138
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Last House On The Block: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
MA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
MS
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$402k · 17 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
27

Total granted

$402k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+53%

Still filing today

35%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalEducationAnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MJ
    MEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +28%
  • MZ
    Memphis Zoological Society
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +70%
  • PO
    Protect Our Aquifer
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • WR
    WOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • DC
    DAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
3
Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee

The jewish federation of nashville is the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community. through its fund-raising, planning and community relations efforts, either independently or in partnership with other jewish…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Community Center of Nashville

The gordon jewish community center welcomes all, builds community, and provides excellent programs rooted in jewish values to enrich the mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
5
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
6
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Community Center

The st. louis jewish community center enriches lives, builds community, promotes inclusivity and creates meaningful jewish experiences.

Human Services
11
Jewish Middle School of Nashville

Inspired by Jewish values, the mission of Jewish Upper School's inclusive community is to guide our students to become engaged learners and passionate leaders so that they may ultimately contribute to a purpose greater than themselves.

Education
12
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memphis Jewish Federation and the most unlike its peers is Protect Our Aquifer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS — $539,200 · ReligionJEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHISIndividual grant recipient — $358,036 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $14,500 · Other+38 more — $44,820 · Other+38 moreMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $38,100 · PhilanthropyDAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMEMPHIS PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER — $4,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $100 · Crime & LegalMemphis Zoological Society — $2,146 · AnimalsProtect Our Aquifer — $1,500 · Environment
Religion$539,200Other$417,356Philanthropy$38,100Arts & Culture$5,000Crime & Legal$4,100Animals$2,146Environment$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS — $539,200 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $38,100 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMEMPHIS PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER — $4,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMemphis Zoological Society — $2,146 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEE COUNTY JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProtect Our Aquifer — $1,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB) — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetB NAI B RITH — $276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUICIDE & CRISIS INTERVENTION SVC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS SCHOOL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FOUNDATION OF MEMPHIS
  • Who funds MEMPHIS JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds MEMPHIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds DAYLIGHT COMMUNITY ARTS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEMPHIS PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER
  • Who funds Memphis Zoological Society
  • Who funds LEE COUNTY JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds Protect Our Aquifer
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH HOME AND HOSPITAL FOR AGED INC (D/B/A MEMPHIS JEWISH HOME & REHAB)
  • Who funds B NAI B RITH
  • Who funds SUICIDE & CRISIS INTERVENTION SVC
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lichterman Loewenberg FoundationTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lichterman Loewenberg Foundation · Belz Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Wurzburg Fdn Warren & Marjorie · Reginald Wurzburg Foundation · The Goldsmith Family Foundation Inc · Herbert Shainberg Foundation · Plough Foundation · The Assisi Foundation of Memphis Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Magdovitz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph