Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Magdalen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Food & Nutrition$175kReligion$157kArts & Culture$140kHealth$40kEducation$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$601k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE CHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETY$25,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$25,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$25,000
CARMELITE MONASTERY OF SEATTLE$10,000
SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JAMES CATHEDRAL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $25k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $25k → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$537k · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$537k
$0

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Seattle Chamber Music Festival
    4× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +102%
  • SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +234%
  • SU
    SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +40%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Orchestra Seattle - Seattle Chamber Singer

    The mission of Orchestra Seattle | Seattle Chamber Singers is to enrich the quality of life in the Pacific Northwest through performance of great orchestral and choral literature; to introduce Northwest audiences to rarely heard works of…

    2
    Seattle Chamber Orchestra

    Gather diverse and talented musicians, professionals and amateurs, to curate and perform orchestral repertoire that uplifts, inspires, and celebrates live performances, as well as offer educational activities concerning music.

    Arts & Culture
    3
    Seattle Chamber Music Society Foundation

    Provide financial support to the Seattle Chamber Music Festival (dba Seattle Chamber Music Society).

    Arts & Culture
    4
    Seattle Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra

    The Seattle Metropolitan Chamber Orchestra crafts performances that tell the story of the human experience in new ways, providing musical arts education and fulfillment to people of all walks of life. SMCO features music by composers of…

    Arts & Culture
    5
    Seattle Pro Musica

    Enrich and inspire our audiences, singers and community through the experience of choral artistry, and to increase access to and appreciationn of choral music

    6
    Philharmonia Northwest

    Philharmonia Northwest contributes to the vitality of the classical music community in the Pacific Northwest by presenting professional concerts highlighting the diverse past and present repertoire for chamber orchestra. It is also…

    Arts & Culture
    7
    The Esoterics

    The Esoterics is a Seattle-based vocal ensemble, dedicated to performing and perpetuating contemporary choral music from around the world.

    Arts & Culture
    8
    Pacific Northwest Music Project
    Arts & Culture
    9
    Seattle Opera Guild

    Supports singer's education with seattle opera.

    Arts & Culture
    10
    Emerald City Music

    Emerald City Music refreshes the chamber music experience by creating a platform of excellence where artists and audience transform one another. Our core pillars are: 1.Audience: We believe that everyone has the right and capacity to…

    Arts & Culture
    11
    San Jose Chamber Music Society

    To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…

    12
    Southwest Washington Center for the Arts
    Philanthropy

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Chamber Music Festival and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    6/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $100,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMUNION GOSPEL MISSION — $95,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSIONCARMELITE MONASTERY OF SEATTLE — $35,000 · OtherCARMELITE MONASTERY OF SEATTLEST JAMES CATHEDRAL — $27,000 · OtherST JAMES CATHEDRALSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · OtherSEATTLE UNIVERSITY+1 more — $5,000 · OtherSeattle Chamber Music Festival — $100,000 · Arts & CultureSeattle Chamber Music Festiva…SOUND SALON — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSOUND SALONThe Early Music Guild of Seattle — $15,000 · Arts & CultureThe Early Music Guild of Seat…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WIGMORE HALL INC — $7,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF WIGMORE H…+1 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $75,000 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCES C…SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Health
    Other$282,000Arts & Culture$139,500Human Services$75,000Health$40,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSeattle Chamber Music Festival — $100,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES — $75,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND SALON — $15,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetThe Early Music Guild of Seattle — $15,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF WIGMORE HALL INC — $7,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
    • Who funds Seattle Chamber Music Festival
    • Who funds SAINT FRANCES CABRINI CHARITABLE SERVICES
    • Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
    • Who funds SOUND SALON
    • Who funds The Early Music Guild of Seattle
    • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WIGMORE HALL INC
    • Who funds MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    ArtsfundWA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Artsfund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Magdalen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph